this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
264 points (98.5% liked)

Android

27883 readers
26 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am surprised that Google spends so much time tackling custom ROMs via it's Play Integrity API. If only they paid that much attention to say, curating the Play Store more, it had be much better for everyone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

extremely pedantic whining over the term "ROM", but when has a custom android distribution ever dealt with "read-only memory"? is or was there some immutable component of Android that could be interpreted as read-only?

also I switched from iPhones to Google Pixels running GrapheneOS four years ago and I've never looked back, it's really solid and gives me the amount of control I expect and demand over hardware I've purchased upfront. Pedantry aside, I strongly recommend GrapheneOS

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you use it on a Pixel? Last I read, that's the only officially supported phone. It feels ironic giving Google money for a phone so you can use deGoogle more.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for it, I just wish it supported more devices.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I do, yes. First on a Pixel 5 and then (and currently) on a Pixel 8 Pro.

The purely emotional icky feeling of giving Google money is far less important than the tangible security, privacy, and usability upsides of GrapheneOS on a supported device. But if that's important to you, just buy a Pixel secondhand, Google gets no money from that.

I wish more devices were supported too, but my understanding is that only Google makes devices that are both secure and open enough.

Article in German, but the relevant points from the GrapheneOS lead are all in english: https://www.kuketz-blog.de/weshalb-grapheneos-aktuell-nur-google-pixel-geraete-unterstuetzt/

One point about Samsung:

Samsung takes security almost as seriously as Google, but they deliberately cripple their devices when you unlock them to install another OS and don’t allow an alternate OS to use important security features

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I did not know most of that. Very informative, thanks!

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Samsung takes security almost as seriously as Google, but they deliberately cripple their devices when you unlock them to install another OS and don’t allow an alternate OS to use important security features

What does the crippling and security features refer to?

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 3 points 1 week ago

Seems like you can't re-lock the bootloader after installing an alternative OS, for one

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 2 points 1 week ago

I know exactly as much as you do about it. Just quoting the lead dev.

[–] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 1 points 1 week ago

It's painful disabling knox so you can root or flash custom roms.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago

They've always been called ROMs, not sure why, but it's been like that since the beginnings of Android

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Does anything related to money work on GOS? Bank apps, check deposits, credit card apps, nfc payments? Any other apps/features disabled by Google?

Seems like a huge sacrifice for perceived privacy improvement.

How is this significantly different from using vanilla Android without signing into any Google accounts?

[–] FoolHen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Payments don't work, because of the play integrity api. But the bank apps that I use do work, even though they didn't in my previous phone that was running a custom ROM with magisk to hide the tampering. GrapheneOs supplies their signatures so that app developers can support it, but I imagine not all will.

For me it has been a great experience so far. Installation was easy and fast, the privacy settings are great and almost everything works for me just fine. I had a couple of issues that was able to fix by searching for it on their forums, which is quite active

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] FoolHen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nfc payments. Google pay doesn't work. I believe any other doesn't work either but Im not 100% sure. I never used them

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago

Oh right, those. I honestly completely forgot that's a thing. And is a fair point, even tho I just use physical cards I totally understand the convenience and security benefits of token based payment systems like that

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Two credit union apps work fine, venmo and paypal work fine. YMMV with other financial institutions but it's not been a problem for me so far.

To answer your last question, there's way too many differences for a lemmy comment, so I suggest reading their features page for a broad overview: https://grapheneos.org/features

One feature that's closest yo your question, though:

Google Play receives absolutely no special access or privileges on GrapheneOS as opposed to bypassing the app sandbox and receiving a massive amount of highly privileged access.

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I read it and I think I understand why people are using it, but just to clarify your Google play example: you still can't use it without being signed into Google account, right? Is your concern what the app does while it's not running? Because it feels like they'll still collect the same amount of info once your sign in to install the apps.

Do you you try to use F-droid for most things?

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's unfortunately really not that simple. But for a short answer, I use Aurora Store for anything I can't get from F-Droid., and even tho I have the Google Play Store installed (as some apps require it for stuff like notifications or location) I'm not ever signed into it and I don't use it to install or update apps

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I tried to use Graphene and bailed because none of my banking apps played nicely. Good luck if you try!

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s firmware, hence why the word ROM stuck. Once you flash the firmware to specific partitions, after the boot you can no longer modify it, unless you have root too. Technically nothing is ROM, there is always a way :).

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago

That makes sense, and immutable OSes seem like a great idea from a security standpoint