this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
323 points (95.8% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
5715 readers
888 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ok, here me out… wait wait just listen. This absolutely violates every Osha regulation in the book, no body is arguing that, but what I am about to argue is this is actually pretty safe.
How about... the tanks could be empty?
Once they have been filled once they are never truly empty.
Even then, it's much safer to assume they are full than gambling on them being empty. Dangerous goods transport regulations don't differentiate for a reason
If they're brand new that would be fine, if they have been used, it may be even more dangerous because they're full of trace fumes.
Whoa that's way too simple.