United States | News & Politics

No, you can blame the non-voters. The ones who thought it was great idea to get pissy about one issue and stay home.

If there's just one issue and you don't even want to say what it is, aren't you implying it's a very important one? Maybe one you would feel bad downplaying if you named it?

But yes if she loses, I do hope you blame those who refused to vote over genocide. And internalize the lesson. And apply it to your future political endeavors.

Or “both sides” their way into an idiotic stance.

When both sides are for genocide you should probably work against them rather than figuring out which to reluctantly support.

And in 2026, you can also blame the non-voters. The ones who elected Kamala president, but are too stupid to understand that voting is an annual process, and Kamala isn’t a fucking queen that can enact anything she wants without the support of a democratically-elected Congress.

Damn those non-voters, don't they know they owe the genociders and their associates their votes!? Those are their votes, just sitting on empty ballots, being useless! How dare they expect literally anything at all! Don't they know that political power is all about pledging absolute allegiance to a party regardless of what they do!? What IDIOTS!

Vote twice a year, every year. Every. Fucking. Time. Why is that so hard to understand?

Don't worry, I do! I don't think you'd like my selections, though.