this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
376 points (95.6% liked)

memes

10335 readers
1646 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

better version of: https://lemmy.world/post/21210097

<3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T156@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's not bad, just mostly redundant these days, as the heuristic features are no longer enabled, and the defaults ublock lists will cover a lot of the same.

[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fyi you can still enable heuristic blocking from settings.

[–] LucidBoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 7 points 3 weeks ago

Privacy badger doesn't require somebody to add an address to a list to block it, it figures our statistically when something should be blocked. The upside is that it can block things that are new and haven't been added to a list. I assume it could also better adapt to new methods to get stuff through a typical blocker.

[–] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Also the heuristics can be exploited to create a unique identifier for your browser, so it’s not a flawless solution.