this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
246 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2410 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So we've seen the complaints and the reports and boy oh boy are there complaints and reports.

I've discussed the account with the other mods and admins multiple times, and while we agree the volume is a lot, it doesn't point to a botfarm or multiple people using the account.

Obsessive? Absolutely, but not technically rule breaking... Until today.

Today they indescriminately posted the same story three times from three different sources apparently solely to flood the channel showing a decided lack of judgement.

It's a valid story from a valid source, the original has been kept here:

https://lemmy.world/post/21098916

The others have been removed as duplicates.

I'm also applying a 15 day temp ban on the account.

"15 days? That's oddly specific! What's in 15... OH!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)
[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

RIP. I'm sure he'll be back with alts, but here are the final stats:

UniversalMonk stats pulled 10/25/2024, 3:20:53 PM EDT

  • Account created 78 days ago (8/8/2024, 9:21:38 PM EDT)
  • 6,272 submissions (= 2,017 posts + 4,255 comments)
  • 80.4 avg submissions / day
  • 11.9 mins avg time between submissions (assuming 8 hrs of sleep / day)
  • 87,814 downvotes accrued (~ 1,126 downvotes / day, 0.20 u:d ratio)
    • -70,379 net reputation score
    • ~ 1.3 mins between downvotes on avg
    • ~ 14.9 avg downvotes / submission
      • ~ 13.2 avg downvotes / comment
      • ~ 19.5 avg downvotes / post
      • ~ -11.4 avg reputation score / comment
      • ~ -13.4 avg reputation score / post
  • ~ 16 typed pages (3,789 words) written / day
    • 236,631 total words written as comments, 58,852 total words written in posts
    • ~ 76 mins / day writing comments (40 wpm)
    • ~ 32 mins / day making posts (40 wpm + 30 secs / post)
  • ~ 140 hrs commenting/posting in 78 days, which breaks down to:
    • ~ 108 mins / day
    • 11.2% of their waking hours

  • None of this takes into account time reading others' posts/comments, or alts this user may have. See the modlog for any communities they've been banned from.


    Top 5 duplicate submissions (of 914 exact matches and 683 which are 70%+ similar)

    spoiler 27 x 'Thank you! :)'
  • 27 x 'Thank you! :)'
  • 26 x 'Thank you!'
  • 22 x 'Yep!'
  • 22 x 'Agreed.'
    :::

  • Fetch user stats yourself with: https://codeberg.org/p00perNickel/lemmy-user-stats

    [–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    I do have to admit to feeling at least a little validated for having called him out way more for his pattern of behavior when it came to interactions with other users as opposed to his posts. His posts were bad but the way he engaged with anyone and everyone was downright toxic. /politics is a better place with him banned, and now Lemmy will be a better place for him being gone. I'm sure he's still out there on some platform playing the poor victim, as I doubt this was a "teachable moment", but I sincerely hope he gets help somewhere. It's cliché, but that dude had issues.

    [–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

    I couldn't agree with you more. Thank you for calling him out. I can definitely say that comments like yours help me keep my resolve and think "it's not just me! Everyone can see it!"

    If you and others hadnt kept calling him on his shit I would've eventually probably just stopped using Lemmy tbh. Users like that absolutely shit in the pool. I'm sure he'd have a lot of whining to do about how he was persecuted for having a different point of view but we all know that was bullshit. Luckily we don't have to endure that whining!

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (7 replies)