this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
314 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

58833 readers
4390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 253 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean, they could solve it by not making the mandatory successor an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. That would be a start. And also relax whatever the artificial requirement is that makes a lot of Win10 machines incompatible with 11.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Windows 10 is already an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. The problem with 11 is the ridiculous hardware requirements.

Windows 10 is trash and has always been. Windows 7 was the last good Windows, and I would still use it if it had security updates and DX12 support (I obviously mainly use Linux, but my gaming PC is on Windows, and no, some games I play and software I use 100% do not work on Linux).

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 11 points 1 day ago

Probably is. I use Linux for everything and only use Win10 at work on a VM with enterprise/LTSB version, so I've been shielded from most of its enshittification.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Having used both, doesn't 11 have the same level of ads as 10 did? It seems like it's really only OneDrive ads if you don't use it if anything?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe? I just said in another comment that I am pretty much exclusively Linux. I only occasionally use a W10 VM at work, and it's enterprise/LTSB so I don't get a lot of that junk.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

100 point top thread based on the second and third hand opinions of a Windows non-user really sums up the quality of this discussion lol

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most Windows-hating threads on Lemmy in a nutshell tbh.

[–] krippix@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

Every thread on lemmy is a windows hating thread by default :D

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

I've lost count of the amount of posts and comment threads on here about "all the horrible ads and spyware" where the solution was to flip literally a single switch in Settings, Personalization.

[–] trespasser69@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, they wont. Micro$oft only cares money rather than basic OS for everyday and professional tasks

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They've been adding spyware and ads into W10 so it's not the money. They could easily add all W11 ads/spyware into 10 with an update. Older CPUs have several hardware vulnerabilities unrelated to the TPU required by W11.

IMO, they should add a startup message listing the hardware vulnerabilities of the installed CPU and leave it up to the customer.

[–] trespasser69@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Windows 11 has more spyware and its more ens***tificated

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yes but that could be added in a W10 update just like they've already done with previous W10 updates.

Windows 11 = O.S. Ima Ad-Laden. Coincidence? I think not..