this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
307 points (95.3% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2356 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A video of Shaaban al-Dalou burning to death after an Israeli strike at a hospital has stoked criticism from Israel’s allies and highlighted the plight of people trapped in Gaza.

He was the son his mother boasted about: He memorized the entire Quran as a boy, and rose to the top of his university class. He wanted to become a doctor. But most of all, Shaaban al-Dalou dreamed of escape.

Since Israel launched its devastating retaliation for the Hamas-led attack just over a year ago, Mr. al-Dalou wrote impassioned pleas on social media, posted videos from his family’s small plastic tent and even launched a GoFundMe page calling out to the world for help getting out of the Gaza Strip.

Instead, the world watched him burn to death.

Mr. al-Dalou, 19, was identified by his family as the young man helplessly waving his arms, engulfed in flames, in a video that has become a symbol of the horrors of war for Gazans, trapped inside their blockaded enclave as the international community looks on.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

The NYTrash is trying to appear unbiased but they can't get there...

He Dreamed of Escaping Gaza. The World Watched ~~Him Burned~~ Zionists Burn Him Alive.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but being explicitly anti-Zionist would be more biased than the neutral language they used here. You don't want unbiased media, you want media biased towards your values. That's fine, but don't pretend that you're offering a less biased headline.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The “neutral language” you’re describing is called passive voice. It’s used to avoid saying who performed the actions in question and that is a form of bias.

In the last few years, newspapers selective use of passive voice - cloaked as “neutral language” - to shield groups or organizations they’re sympathetic to from police to the idf has come under fire because people recognize it as deflecting blame from the powerful and casting the injustice and violence of those in power as unavoidable tragedy.

He just burned to death, isn’t that sad? Alexa play despacito.

[–] match@pawb.social -2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

at this point more than just the israelis are responsible for burning him alive

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

He burned to death in an Israeli strike on a hospital. Who else should be blamed in the story about the effect and meaning of his tragic killing? What particular responsible party should be named in the headline of that story?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago

I would argue the United States also carries the blame as they've supported Israel's genocide, but that's secondary to the primary point, on which you and I agree.

[–] microphone900@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think sentiment is changing. Recently I'm noticing more US mainstream media using language like

Since Israel launched its devastating retaliation for the Hamas-led attack just over a year ago

It's a small thing, it's better than the softer language they would normally use. But, damn, it's not enough.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago

They are still directly implying the genocide is retaliation. This is the crux of all the propaganda.

Every Israeli expansion has been under the guise of self defense. It always follows the same order:

  • Oppress Palestinians for long enough, and kill any attempt for a peaceful resolution.

  • The the Palestinians see no other option and retaliate.

  • Israel commits a genocide and "defends themselves" onto more land.