this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
269 points (97.2% liked)

science

14806 readers
159 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Many voters are willing to accept misinformation from political leaders – even when they know it’s factually inaccurate. According to our research, voters often recognize when their parties’ claims are not based on objective evidence. Yet they still respond positively, if they believe these inaccurate statements evoke a deeper, more important “truth.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Why do you post an article you haven't even read?

[–] VoterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Because even if it winds up being a bad study, it still evokes a deeper, more important “truth.”

I'm being sarcastic but that's actually what's going on here.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

It looked interesting and that was good enough.