GIMP 3.0 is over 96% complete! The GIMP team got sick at the Libre Arts conference over the summer, hence the setback to the release schedule but they are now back making good progress.

Along with non-destructive editing and a colour overhaul we've all been waiting for, longstanding critics of the UI/UX will be pleased to hear that GIMP are setting up a UX repository and are looking to build a dedicated team of designers to develop this.

All of these things look set to make the GIMP project feel a lot more current and dynamic. I can't wait!

And if anyone wants to help out it looks like testing/reporting, donations and updating the help manual are all welcomed by the project at the moment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (6 children)

Can someone tell me what the worst UI issues are in GIMP? I only ever used GIMP for casual, easy editing and idk, I don't really get the hate. I'm not saying there aren't UI issues, just that I don't use photo editing software enough to understand them.

[–] ByteWelder@feddit.nl 14 points 4 weeks ago

For me, it’s the feature discovery that’s massively lacking. Last week I wanted to scale the selected area. Had to search for it online. The UX is the least intuitive one of all drawing software I’ve used.

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It used to be way worse. I first tried gimp 10ish years ago and instead of the program running from a single window it was like the canvas, the hierarchy tree, and every other toolbox had its own separate window. I think they updated that a while ago now.

[–] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I too used it back in the separate-windows days, and thought it was pretty terrible. As soon as it got updated (which took quite a while) I didn't have problems with the UI. People saying "you have to look up guides to learn how to use it" is to me... Well, doesn't every professional tool/program require some getting used to? It's not like you just open up Photoshop and know how to use it.

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 6 points 4 weeks ago

I agree with you there. I've personally found it very interesting to try new programs and figure out each one's layout and work flow, but I've found many people absolutely hate doing that. I get it, if you want to just use the product for what it's intended for maybe you don't want to waste time learning the differences. All of that in consideration, I don't think gimp is that bad

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

For minor things it works alright. For slightly advanced things, like making making curved text, it's not intuitive compared to Photoshop. Though personally, even for minor things I found Krita more pleasant.

A UI designer made this little short about Gimp, which I think captures the sorta things that can be frustrating.

I'm extremely pleased to hear they will be taking UI seriously.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

I don't know how to specifically tell you that it's really fucking bad other than the fact that I can never figure things out without looking them up because it's really bad and it's not good and that's why I can't

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

For me, the biggest thing was the program not running from a single window. IIRC there was actually a separate fork of GIMP that made it run in a single window called GIMPshop or something, and that made it into a single window. I'm not sure when GIMP itself got single window functionality.

It's a lot more usable these days.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I find the UI completely fine. But I think a lot of people expect it to be a perfect and direct clone of photoshop that you don't have to pay for, rather than its own piece of software and are consequently upset when they have to learn how to use it. People forget that they had to learn how to use photoshop as well.

Like you, I've asked people to give a specific example of something that is clearly bad about GIMP and either don't get a proper answer, or they name something from an ancient version.