Firefox

17752 readers

363 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

263

Google is Killing uBlock Origin. No Chromium Browser is Safe. (www.quippd.com)

submitted 1 day ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the ...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Vivaldi is including its own adblock outside of the manifest system that uses many of the same blocklists that uBlock does (although at this point you have to add them manually) and hopes to get near the same functionality by the time it is pulled and Mv3 is implemented. They originally had plans to offer a Mv2 compliant area but after seeing how Mv3 was going to be implemented, they changed there plans to many users dismay.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think many people use Vivaldi. Also it is mostly proprietary so that's a hard pass for me.

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Roughly 92% of the browser’s code is open source coming from Chromium, 3% is open source coming from us, which leaves only 5% for our UI closed-source code.

https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/why-isnt-vivaldi-browser-open-source/

Only the UI part is not open source.

[–] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 14 points 23 hours ago

Partially proprietary still means proprietary.

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What's the point of keeping part of the UI closed source?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

I've seen their reasoning, but I don't agree with it. The biggest counterexample to their concerns are other browsers: Firefox is no trouble maintaining its IP, and Brave is fully open source yet has not been formed once AFAIK.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my personal experience, and with great regret, I must say that Brave does a better job with its built-in ad blocking than Vivaldi has. Even after I did my damnedest to tweak the ad blocker settings (adding more lists from more sources, removing the "allow some ads" list, etc).

[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Brave itself is filled with ads. Crypto wallets, BAT, VPNs. I just want a browser.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm very aware of its built-in bloat, but the ad blocking still seems to perform more like an MV2 ad blocker than an MV3 one (more is blocked even when using the same lists), and it allows you to natively select individual elements to block yourself.

[–] d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 23 hours ago

But how else will Brandon Eich fund his homophobia and covid conspiracies?