this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
8 points (56.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7210 readers
326 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Much credit to this post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

LMAO at the amount of "her entire career has been about building and filling internment camps, but at least she doesn't have the popular support for a soft coup!" in this thread.

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

A federal prosecutor has always dedicated her career to building "internment camps" but a literal coup that led to several deaths was "soft"?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't tell which you're trying to do, apologize for maga chuds or kamala's abuse of black people and immigrants.

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's right where I want to be. So on the fence you frustratingly want me to just pick any side.

But for your own sanity sake, I prefer to side with society freedoms. I'm too young and broke to care about tax brackets or inflation rate.

[–] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Several deaths:

six people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, three died of natural causes, and a police officer died after being assaulted by rioters.

I'll admit it may technically be a mischaracterization, but I don't think you understand the level of violence that is typical of "hard" coups.

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I just disagree with softening the word by adding "soft" at the beginning. A soft coup is a coup. Date rape is still rape, candy-corn-murder is still murder. No need to add prefixes to try and categorize them, and artificially make some sort of hierarchy.

By naming it any less than a coup, and holding all coups to the same standard, it's an attempt to soften it, and I am against that.

[–] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not a hierarchy per se so much as different categories/distinctions which I do think is useful. A serial killer is different than a hitman which is different than a soldier. I agree they are all functionally the same but they serve different purposes and have different characteristics which are important to keep in mind when talking about them.

That being said you've changed my mind on calling it a "soft" coup as it doesn't really accurately describe the differences I was trying to convey. "Incompetent, halfhearted, and poorly planned autocoup" would be more accurate but it's a mouthful and I don't know if that's the most useful distinction either.

Either case thanks for the pushback!

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

I definitely agree we have different names for different scenarios!

When a rich person is murdered, they're assassinated

When a religious figure does a magic trick, it's a miracle etc