this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
289 points (96.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1927 readers
344 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's give her a little more credit and also say

  1. She was able to give about as good of a solid answer as one can in that den of snakes.

Literally no soft ball questions, unlike the interviews Trump is willing to sit for. I was surprised she even had a good answer regarding the stupid transgender surgeries bit those 'phobes have been pushing, pointing out federal law that even the Trump administration followed.

Not sure if it'll sway any of the brainwashed, but it might be some people's first exposure to her and first impressions matter, especially if she wins and needs to combat misinformation.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

I'd assume her staff diligently went over all the repugs talking points, prepared lines of answering, briefed her and generally advised her well, which she converted into a solid delivery. That's the most presidential thing ever: picking competent specialists, trusting them, listening, then packaging the decisions resulting from their expertise in a presentation suitable for the public who generally don't have the time to do all that themselves.