As technology advances and computers become increasingly capable, the line between human and bot activity on social media platforms like Lemmy is becoming blurred.

What are your thoughts on this matter? How do you think social media platforms, particularly Lemmy, should handle advanced bots in the future?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even more problematic are entire communities made out of astroturfing bots. This kind of stuff is increasingly easy and cheap to set up and will fool most people looking for advise online.

[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am convinced that the bidet shills on reddit are bots. There's just no way that hundreds of thousands of people are suddenly interested in shitting appliances.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Big Bidet at it again

[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

You might consider me an independent thinker (I shit in the woods)

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 1 points 1 month ago

There's an easy way to tell.

If they're talking about a bidet without a heater, they're a bot because no human on earth wants an ass spraying of cold water.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe we should look for ways of tracking coordinated behaviour. Like a definition I've heard for social media propaganda is "coordinated inauthentic behaviour" and while I don't think it's possible to determine if a user is being authentic or not, it should be possible to see if there is consistent behaviour between different kind of users and what they are coordinating on.

Edit: Because all bots do have purpose eventually and that should be visible.

Edit2: Eww realized the term came from Meta. If someone has a better term I will use that instead.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~