this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
198 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59300 readers
4750 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We’re [burying] thousands of tonnes of hazardous materials daily.

Are we though?

About 400,000 tonnes of used fuel has been discharged from reactors worldwide, but only about one-third has been reprocessed.

[–] dgmib@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. Nuclear waste is tiny. That’s the point.

Nuclear isn’t the only hazardous waste we dispose of burying it.

We’re disposing of tonnes of hazardous waste daily. Only a tiny percentage of that is nuclear waste.

Yet for some reason everyone loses their mind about the comparatively tiny amount of hazardous waste from nuclear and no one cares about the significantly larger about of hazardous waste from the eventual disposal of solar panels and 100s of other sources of hazardous waste.

The half life of solar panels is insignificant.

The half life of high grade nuclear waste is significant.