this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
328 points (96.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1927 readers
458 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Musk is (thankfully) ineligible to be President, but yes.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 month ago

Based on current legislation, sure. But that's not set in stone. Russia also had a term limit for its president. Until Putin decided otherwise. Remember, this will be 'the last election'. Maybe Trump just announces the next king once he decides to go.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

SCOTUS will make sure that doesn’t apply.

If not one of the Trump children, I wonder who Musk’s running mate will be.

[–] Raverbunny@aussie.zone 8 points 1 month ago

It's okay, once Trump gets back in next year he will make changes so his pal can succeed him, not to worry.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are there similar wickets to be met for VP? If not...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, mainly because the way it was originally designed to work is that all the candidates would run for President and the one who got the second-most votes would become VP (LOL).

Not sure about loopholes further down the line of succession, though. It's supposed to skip over people who aren't eligible, but what if nobody is eligible?