this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
206 points (95.6% liked)

Futurology

1784 readers
53 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Maybe every time sapient life manages to evolve to dominate a planet, being selfish pricks like us is the only way their species was able to survive to get to that point, so they always end up destroying themselves. Would explain the Fermi paradox.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I feel this is a very anthropocentric view of things, projecting our own failings (some of which are coded in our genes) and assuming they're some kind of universal law of nature.

It's basically assuming that somehow every intelligent species would choose capitalism as their organising principle, something we've only 'decided' on 200 years ago.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This seems like projection, they stated being selfish in order to survive, that exists without capitalism and isn’t limited to humans in any way.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

There's also the possibility that a species managed to live more in harmony with nature and just never made it off the planet. The point is that nobody seems to have been able to create an interplanetary civilization in the observable universe.