this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
245 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

34891 readers
626 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 174 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Importantly, if you have already opted out of sending data to Mozilla, this change will not affect you. It only sends data if you have the setting turned on. It takes just a few clicks to entirely disable it, and Mozilla deletes all record of your browser within 30 days from turning off this feature. If you're worried about it, do it now, it's just under Settings > Privacy & Security. Instructions are also linked in the blog post.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 74 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a fan of the telemetry being enabled by default but having the option to completely disable it makes it not that bad. Though Mozilla definitely doesn't need search history data (unless the law enforcements told them to collect it) so this change is kinda sus

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 38 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It seems like a profit-driven thing to me. Big piles of anonymized data are worth a pretty penny.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

From what I read in their blog post, nobody is keeping your search history data. It only tracks how often people in general search for things in specific categories, so nobody will be able to learn anything about you specifically from that data.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Then what's the point in collecting such data? It won't help to fix bugs, add new features or even make useful statistics to show publicly. Only personalized ads is what comes to mind. Yes it seems to be anonymized well enough but still ad companies love such data. Maybe Mozilla wants to implement a custom ads functionality that uses this data or they just want to sell it idk. Still changes in this direction are kinda sus

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 77 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm on the "OK but keep an eye on it" train, here.

Devs need feedback to know how people are using the product, and opt-out tracking is the best way to do it. In this case, it seems like my personal data is completely unidentifiable.

I was coding in the IE6 era, so I'd really prefer to not end up in a browser engine monoculture again.

[–] Reawake9179@lemmy.kde.social 30 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I don't need freaking suggestions from the browser, that's the job of the search engine of my choice.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

most search engines don't keep anonymous search data so that's what firefox is trying to fix.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 73 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To disable it in about:config

browser.search.serpEventTelemetry.enabled = false

browser.search.serpEventTelemetryCategorization.enabled = false

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de 73 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Its exactly this kind of bullshit that firefox should not do...

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This looks fine, the browser just puts your search into a category like "health" or "tech", then sends the amount of each category completely anonymously.

Also, if you've opted out of data collection already that setting applies to this too.

[–] mouse@midwest.social 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree. I am someone who values their privacy and often does not like opt-out style analytics however I also know opt-in skews analytics. The way the searches are only categorized, and they are using Oblivious HTTP keeping IP addresses private makes me A-OK with this.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 months ago

This is the best take so far, I totally agree

[–] not_a_king@beehaw.org 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

i know they're a company and they need to float, but this should be opt in not opt out

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 27 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Yes but we really should be grateful to have a somewhat mainstream open-source browser with a great ecosystem of extensions and ability to turn off the telemetry. It could've been much worse

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Opt-in telemetry is useless telemetry, they make it opt-out because its the only way to get representative numbers

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Why do you need unwilling representing numbers in the first place? Just ask advanced users on the official forum about what they want to see added. You only really need error logs that are absolutely opt-in

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 months ago

"advanced users" on forums are rarely very representive of users as a whole.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The number of people who actually change their default settings is quite small. Those of us who have these discussions are a distinct minority in the sum userbase.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I used this fact a lot in arguments and I agree. What I'm saying is that it could be worse

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago

And I agree with you.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago

I have not seen a single case where advanced users have the same opinions as the average one

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

All we want is 1990s Google, guys. That's really all we want. None of this AI BS that kind find a country in Africa that starts with a K, just Google without the evil enshitification layer on top.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I think people forget how awful google pre ~2008 was. Not in terms of the bullshit they do nowadays, just in quality of results really.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 25 points 6 months ago

Remember, you can always opt out of sending any technical or usage data to Firefox. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to adjust your settings. We also don’t collect category data when you use Private Browsing mode on Firefox.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

firefox develops an optional predictive search feature like every other search engine and browser has that actually protects user privacy that can easily be turned off so naturally the internet loses their mind over it and declares firefox dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

The important part that you should know (and should already be using):

Remember, you can always opt out of sending any technical or usage data to Firefox. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to adjust your settings.

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 18 points 6 months ago

As much as I hate to say it, Firefox is a privacy mess.

Pocket and Fakespot have very bad privacy policies. The Windows version has a unique Mozilla tracker if you download the installer from the website, and the android version has Google Analytics built in. The existing and new telemetry is a but heavy, but it's anonymised so it's really the lesser of the various evils.

My recommendation is LibreWolf & Fennec as alternatives.

[–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Innovation and privacy go hand in hand here at Mozilla

As well as profits and corporate interests.

People speak very good thing about Firefox but they like to hide and avoid the shady stuff. Let me give you the un-cesored version of what Firefox really is. Firefox is better than most, no double there, but at the same time they do have some shady finances and they also do stuff like adding unique IDs to each installation.

Firefox does is a LOT of calling home. Just fire Wireshark alongside it and see how much calling home and even calling 3rd parties it does. From basic ocsp requests to calling Firefox servers and a 3rd party company that does analytics they do it all, even after disabling most stuff in Settings and config like the OP did.

I know other browsers do it as well, except for Ungoogled and because of that I’m sticking with it. I would like to avoid programs that need no snitch whenever I open them. ungoogled-chromium + ublock origin + decentraleyes + clearurls and a few others.

Now you’re free to go ahead and downvote this post as much as you would like. I’m sorry for the trouble and mental break down I may have caused by the sudden realization that Firefox isn’t as good and private after all.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

I genuinely didn't know all that. Thanks for bringing that up. I've been lazy and told myself countless times I should switch to LibreWolf. Now's the time.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

clearurls

If you use the “AdGuard URL Tracking Protection” under Privacy in uBlock Origin. Also add Actually Legitimate URL Shortener Tool & ClearURLs for uBo. You don’t need ClearURL.

You can add lists by going to Filter lists -> Import… at the bottom of the page -> C&P the URL in the box -> Apply Changes -> Done.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

To improve Firefox based on your needs, understanding how users interact with essential functions like search is key.

Buddy, I just want to type a search term and get results. Stop spying on my search. Your only job is to transfer it to the server and then present the result. I don't need you to suggest some bullshit to me, or think of "ways to improve search".

This helps us take a step forward in providing a browsing experience that is more tailored to your needs, without us stepping away from the principles that make us who we are.

No. What the fuck? They are sounding more and more like Google. We need a new alternative that isn't built from Gecko or Blink or whatever the engines are called.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Buddy, I just want to type a search term and get results.

Telemetry can help them do better at providing that. Devs aren't magical beings, they don't know what's working and what's not unless someone tells them.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

That's like saying the window pane between me and the teller has to understand the conversation and dynamically modify the light between him and I. The window pane's only job is to let light through. Keep it at that.

Anti Commercial-AI license

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Telemetry doesn't need topic categorization. This is building a dataset for AI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Here’s the current list of categories we’re using: animals, arts, autos, business, career, education, fashion, finance, food, government, health, hobbies, home, inconclusive, news, real estate, society, sports, tech and travel.

No pr0n?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›