this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
78 points (95.3% liked)

Android

17678 readers
28 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The price tag is pretty important.

For my fellow maple syrup gatherers, it's $219.12 Canadian.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 29 points 7 months ago

Availability is also pretty important. But you have to go through most of the checkout process before you find out it's only available in Europe.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

All three of them

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Lol, it's funny how a product like this will likely get a solid 4 star rating, meanwhile I'll find another that is better, has better reviews, and costs easily a quarter of this

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was pretty pissed about having my $400 earbuds die after a couple of years. If these things last for six or eight, I'd be happy.

[–] fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You know what didn't die yet? My 8 year old earbuds that have a wire and plugs into the jack. And guess what, I don't even have to charge them or worry about losing one of them.

Fuck wireless headphones.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Especially with the growing trend to use wireless headphones to push people to buy new headphones when they don't need them. It does nothing but create waste and lose us money.

[–] hepasid851@lemy.lol 3 points 7 months ago

seriously. like I totally get why someone would want them, but to not have the option to use wired too? come on.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

meanwhile I’ll find another that is better, has better reviews, and costs easily a quarter of this

Yeah, duh. It's fair as in "fair trade", not fair as in "I think it's fair that child labor in poor countries made my cheapo headphones".

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 7 months ago

I'll save North Americans a click: they're not available here.

[–] evo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I respect what they are trying to do here. I just replaced the batteries in my Sony WF-1000XM4 earbuds... it was not a trivial process.

[–] recursivesive@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Fuck Sony overpriced crap. I'm still salty with their v2 update that damaged the battery.

[–] erikwong@lemdro.id 1 points 7 months ago

[batteryas an Electronic product core

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Glad there's a pair of wireless earbuds with replaceable batteries now, but it's pretty obvious that they only removed the headphone jack on their phone so they could sell more of these. i don't want to encourage scummy business practices like this from fairphone of all businesses, especially when all it does is worsen the user experience and create more waste.

Edit for clarity

Edit 2: am i actually in the wrong here? People seem to disagree with me pretty strongly.

Edit 3: it seems like my comments here aren't showing up in other instances. Something weird going on.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You're not wrong, lots of people on Lemmy.world just really kiss up to fairphone because of their perceived betterness in other ways. Just because they claim to be doing some things better doesn't mean they aren't doing anything wrong or scummy.

Also I bet there's quite a few apple fanboys here who support copying apple in removing features, for some strange reason.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Alright, i thought i was going crazy for a minute there.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

it’s pretty obvious that they only removed the headphone jack on their phone so they could sell more of these

Why is anytime when anything by Fairphone is posted, everyone acts as if they were the first and only company who did that sort of thing? They'd keep the jack and sell wired headphones if that was such a massive business.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, people seem to have a real hard-on for pissing over Fairphone, in a totally weird way. And this travelled over from Reddit. And I know the majority of /r/android has long been Samsung fanbois, but sometimes it gets ridiculous. πŸ˜…

Back to the actual topic at hand, wow they're chunkers. Ouff. Since I have a comparatively small head these would look pretty weird on me I imagine. But OTOH, damn is it impressive to build earbuds - a device usually filled with glue - with a user-replaceable battery. I kinda want to support them assuming I need new headphones any time soon.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, people seem to have a real hard-on for pissing over Fairphone, in a totally weird way.

I hope these people don't find out that the Framework 16 notebook got rid of an on-board headphone jack and moved to a USB-C adapter as well. There might be riots.

And I know the majority of /r/android has long been Samsung fanbois, but sometimes it gets ridiculous. πŸ˜…

Fuck, I have a Samsung phone (from work, not actually mine but private use permitted) and Fairbuds XL. I use products from both companies on a daily basis. Which camp to I have to join now?

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I hope these people don’t find out that the Framework 16 notebook got rid of an on-board headphone jack and moved to a USB-C adapter as well. There might be riots.

Can't you still buy a headphone jack, though? Which to me is actually cool. Consistency, the more modular the better.

Fuck, I have a Samsung phone (from work, not actually mine but private use permitted) and Fairbuds XL. I use products from both companies on a daily basis. Which camp to I have to join now?

Ah, I'm sorry to inform you but the company shill police is on their way. You will be re-indoctrinated, probably for Apple.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Can’t you still buy a headphone jack, though?

Yes, it's a USB-C adapter: https://frame.work/products/audio-expansion-card Due its form factor it's basically unusable for other devices, though (it could put strain on the USB port).

It costs twice as much as Fairphone's own USB-C adapter: https://shop.fairphone.com/shop/usb-c-to-mini-audio-jack-adapter-3-5mm-18

You will be re-indoctrinated, probably for Apple.

I already have Apple's USB-C headphone jack adapter. I feel even more confused now.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Because the entire point of fairphone is to not do those sorts of things. I'd rather not see them go the way of enthusiast phones and use greenwashing to get them popular so they can turn around and be another unethical smartphone giant. It's worthwhile to call them out on stuff like this.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Because the entire point of fairphone is to not do those sorts of things.

That's not their point, as their website makes pretty damn clear. They state their goals openly, and pretty clearly.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because the entire point of fairphone is to not do those sorts of things.

And there I am thinking the point of Fairphone was to not waste resources manufacturing components that only few people even want.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe it's both. How come your okay with them making people throw away their perfectly good headphones?

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why would I throw away my perfectly good bluetooth headphones just because a phone removes the audio jack? πŸ€”

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Why would I throw away my perfectly good wired headphones because a phone removes the audio jack?

(The dongles sound measurably better than 90% of the headphones jacks on phones).

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Or maybe not making everybody throw away their perfectly good headphones?

"everyone"? That's a very bold claim. I would assume they did market research and concluded that putting more components in all of their phones is more wasteful than manufacturing a limited number of USB-C adapters for those who actually want it. Again: They'd sell wired headphones if the demand was that high.

Framework Computers also relegated the headphone jack to a USB-C adapter. There is clearly a wider shift in the industry.