This is an editorial. It is not "news" and it should not be labelled as such.
I still think it's an interesting thing to discuss but it's misleading to post this in a sub about world news without indicating that it is an opinion piece.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
This is an editorial. It is not "news" and it should not be labelled as such.
I still think it's an interesting thing to discuss but it's misleading to post this in a sub about world news without indicating that it is an opinion piece.
This article doesn't make much sense to me, and the parts that do make sense don't seem very realistic.
By calling for conquest,
Xi has not called for the "conquest" of Taiwan, has he? Using that word would be a massive escalation that would be all over the news. I'm pretty sure "reunified" is the word they use.
Xi has made an enemy of the Taiwan’s tribes
Taiwan's indigenous population overwhelmingly support the KMT, for complex historical reasons. The KMT want closer ties with Beijing and are certainly favoured by Xi himself. I don't think it's fair to say that "Taiwan's tribes" are an enemy of Xi.
“The only possibility for Taiwan to truly achieve independence from China’s grasp is, in theory, only to first allow the Indigenous tribes of Taiwan to establish an independent nation named ‘Formosa,’” said Chuan-ju Cheng, an associate professor of Indigenous studies at the Taipei University of Education ... After that, “the Han people of Taiwan could join the new state,”
I don't see what incentive China has to buy this. Taiwan's too important for them to give up just because of a rebrand. And I can't see Taiwan's current leaders giving away power to a community that's less than 3% of the population - however just the cause may be. Also, that's not even the correct name of the university. It's National Taipei University of Education - I studied Mandarin there for a semester.
A lot of Americans really want China to go to war with Taiwan.
[All countries in North and South America avoid eye contact.]
The indigenous peoples of Scandinavia are the Sami and Suomi.
The only people in the British Isles left with a majority of Celtic blood are the Irish, everyone else has been tainted with Anglo-Saxon blood.
All Germanic racial filth should be expelled, they are clearly equally guilty of the sins of their ancestors.
/S
(And don't ask if there was anyone there before the Celts)
Yeah, I was gonna say….
What in the world makes anybody think China would care what the indigenous tribes say? Their outstanding track record of:
Interesting. Doesn't that make Han Chinese, who identify as Taiwanese, as colonizers? I'm happy to support whatever is against CCP but I don't want to have another Israel/Palestine situation in this planet..
Not all colonialism situations are equal. The Israel and Palestine situation is just a particularly messy one. In Taiwan, the colonialism has already happened. The indigenous population is already assimilated with the society of their colonisers. Indigenous rights are a topic of discussion in Taiwanese politics but it isn't as hot of an issue as Palestinian rights in Israel.
The campaign for indigenous rights in Taiwan is one that is willing to "play ball" and work within the bounds of the island's political system, and their strategy is largely effective in terms of securing those rights.
Could send Beijing a copy of America's own historical brush with war declared over the assumed course of action intended by a recently elected president.