this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
332 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59300 readers
4940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Call of Duty bans more than 14,000 cheaters in 24 hours::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

No matter how I think about it, I just can't understand why anyone would waste time doing this

[–] yumpoopsoup@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's just the feeling of superiority without actually having to be superior.

[–] Robertej92@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Oh hey, that's why so many of them are also white supremacists and mysogynists

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ninja@hoboninjachicken.com 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In the words of a friend who used to cheat (and now regrets it), it felt nice to actually be able to win at something when life tends to hand you so many losses.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

A lot of shitty things done by shitty people seems to stem from people feeling shitty about themselves 🙁

Can't get a job, can't get laid, can't find a friend breeds resentment but instead of bettering themselves they want to make other people feel shitty too.

As a semi edge lord in my teen years I remember that feeling. And I remember how "good" it felt to watch FOX News because they were the one place that told me that everything shitty in the world was someone else's fault, not mine.

It takes self reflection and growing up to get out of that shitty mindset that a lot of people don't seem capable of doing 😕

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

But is it really a win?

[–] ram@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Have you ever used cheats on single player games when that was still a thing developers put in games? I did, it was fun. That's why.

[–] Giooschi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I did that a couple of times, but it was more like "I don't want to grind all of this stuff, I want to skip to the fun part". Also, it's morally different because it impacts nobody else.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 5 points 1 year ago

Oh yes, I did it. But back at the time you had to wait months to finally have the cheatcode published on some magazine. And you just cheat on yourself, not other players.

BTW, nice times... 😀

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone who is ashamed to admit that I used to hack in StarCraft: Brood War when I was 12, this is the answer. It's fun.

Also I was absolute garbage at the game no matter how much I played, so I was trying to level the playing field a bit. Still got my ass handed to me over and over. Hacks can't replace skill.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Hacks can’t replace skill.

They absolutely can.

[–] caballeroAguila@mujico.org 10 points 1 year ago

There are some people who really have nothing else going on in their lives.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hacked Zelda to because I'm not great at games but enjoy the story and I can progress the game at a reasonable pace without being overly frustrated. Also it doesn't affect anyone else so it makes it ok.

[–] ours@lemmy.film 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Single-player games are a whole different thing. People should be able to play single-player in whatever way they prefer as it doesn't impact anybody but themselves. Some games even come with "story-mode" difficulties and such for people just looking to enjoy the story and not looking for a challenge and that's fine. Games used to come with cheat codes for the same purpose (well, for testing purposes initially but eventually for "play it whatever way you want").

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it still allowed when it's a Nintendo game though?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cheaters really need to just fuck off and do something else with their lives. They are just sad assholes who can't accomplish anything without cheating. With that lack of integrity, they'd make great CEOs. But with the lack of morality and stick-to-it-ness, I guess they'd fit better as middle management.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Games should make hacker servers or hacker zones where it’s free for all to change your game however you want it. I understand the fin in changing the gameplay of a game to make it new.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would love a sneaky anti cheating system, where if you are detected the game behind the scenes starts making everyone else's shot at you 100% headshots 😂 so there you are, trying to cheat, but you can't get a single shot off because stray bullets are just homing at your noggen!

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I love the hilarousness of the idea, but unfortunately aimbots can just auto-fire at the first pixel, while humans won't even register that you appeared for "long" milliseconds. However, if the game can force other people's shots at you then I guess it can also force your shots to miss.

[–] dimspace@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Or even better, it forces a banana suit on you, so you can carry on playing but everyone knows who you are.

[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's been done before in Minecraft anarchy servers. The results are fascinating

[–] doyadig@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Ever seen what a griefer can do to another players building? Imagine that but on a 100x larger scale

[–] hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Look up fit-mc on YouTube, he has a ton of videos on the history of the oldest anarchy server in Minecraft.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some already do. You have what's known as "cheater ques" or "cheater lobbies" where cheaters get shadowbanned to only play against other cheaters

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why say "in 24 hours" when it's a ban wave. They detected the cheater long before "24h".

[–] marmo7ade@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because it is semantics. Does a wave end or does it go on forever? The literal process to ban the identified cheaters was done within 24 hours. You could say the wave lasted 24 hours. No part of the article discusses how long ago they identified the cheaters.

"targeted and banned within 24 hours"

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I get told I'm being semantic a noticeable about of times. Must be nice to know what information is apparently inconsequential.

[–] dlpkl@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I was falsely banned while playing the early access campaign. I put zero weight into these claims that they e banned x number of users.

[–] emptyother@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was instantly permabanned for adding RAM to my computer while having the game installed. First game I've ever been banned before. And instantly permanent? I would think there would be a warning at least! I wonder how many else are falsely banned.. Because @kadu@lemmy.world have a point, it used to be those who cheated who complained, and this makes it difficult for a faulty cheat detection to be picked up by the devs. More so when they think "they have fixed it" after the first time a wave got falsely banned.

I spent a day really angry about it, ranting on reddit. Was pretty shocked from it. Then I calmed down and figured I didnt enjoy that game enough to take it further.

[–] dlpkl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That sucks man sorry to hear that. I spent a little bit longer than you ranting and raving lol. It wasn't so much that I was upset about not being able to play, because honestly I didn't like the game very much, but more that this massive corporation just stole $100 from me and there was literally no recourse. Never buying a single thing from Activision and their parent company again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Eh, they'll all be back tomorrow.

[–] RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to everyone you talk to in FPS games nobody ever cheats.

[–] Deftdrummer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Like how in prison everyone there is innocent?

[–] egeres@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"...This feature gives developers the ability to deploy flagged decoys both as a deterrent for identified cheaters and as a method to detect suspicious players..."

Damn, that's a convoluted genious-mind-game right there. Place a fake "elements of interest" for a cheater, see if they fall for it, run inferential statistics to determine if they significantly have an erratic behavior from the rest of the players, ban them if p < 0.05

[–] echoplex21@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they’ll crackdown on the old titles as well. With the acquisition all but locked , I feel MS will try to promote a lot of the older titles on GamePass which will definitely experience a massive boost in popularity.

load more comments
view more: next ›