Personal Finance

3828 readers

1 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

WandererLagomorph799@lemmy.ml

nieceandtows@programming.dev

nieceandtows@lemmy.ml

654

Landlords should have to pay income tax on their rental properties regardless of whether they're rented out or not. (gothamist.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de to c/personalfinance@lemmy.ml

185 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

(page 4) 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

Feel free to react here or on !economics@lemmy.ml

[–] Job4130@kbin.run -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No. Landlords should be able to do with their property what they want.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Ambiorickx@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

The unemployed should have to pay income tax on the income they would earn if they were employed

load more comments