this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
28 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
943 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But EU privacy advocates like NOYB have protested Meta's plan to offer a subscription model instead of consenting to data sharing, calling it a "pay or OK model" that forces Meta users who cannot pay the fee to consent to invasive data sharing they would otherwise decline. In a statement shared with Ars, NOYB chair Max Schrems said that even if Meta reduced its fees to 1.99 euros, it would be forcing consent from 99.9 percent of users.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think it's better than ok-only model. Facebook for example is a large network which consumes probably millions of dollars a day of power and maintenance to run. If the EU can control the data hunger of it (so they don't ask for both data and money at the same time or increase the fee to something unreasonable), "pay or ok" and even paywalls are quite viable options. People should at least be able to pay with money instead of data if they can't switch to an alternative