this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
36 points (100.0% liked)

tails: A Place for Mastodon Posts

328 readers
1 users here now

A virtual community

Posts from Mastodon users, featured natively in a community, so you can view them without the need for them to be re-hosted or screenshoted, and reply to the original author and Mastodon respondents if you wish.

Has so far included content from Warsandpeas, Mr. Lovenstein, SMBC, Loading Artist, Low Quality Facts, nixCraft, ElleGray, and other interesting or provocative stuff I've random'd across on Mastodon.


Supported:
Comments & Upvotes
Unsupported:
Posts, Downvotes, & PD's Automod

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

These rows are perfectly horizontal and are not moving. A mind-bending anomalous motion variation of the Café wall illusion by Akiyoshi Kitaoka.

Source: http://www.psy.ritsumei.ac.jp/akitaoka/motion30e.html

Image transcription: Rows of black and white zigzag patterns forming 2x2 checkerboards on a grey background create an optical illusion of warping and motion.


(Originally published on mastodon.social: 2024-02-16)

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Wow... And if you really want to see something crazy, scroll it up and down...

[–] THE_MASTERMIND@feddit.ch 1 points 10 months ago

Thats what i thought this was about as i don’t see anything special when it is still. Am i doing something wrong ?

[–] weilawei@mastodon.online 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you get out an image editor and compare where the pixels fade to the background grey, they are nearly, but not pixel perfect to the same height on the peaks of each row. Different peaks come to different heights. The darker shaded top left ones come up 2 pixels higher than the light ones.
Saying they're perfectly horizontal is slightly misleading. A sawtooth wave on a oscilloscope is perfectly horizontal also. Technically correct, but also omitting some key detail.

[–] Waitnwallflower@beige.party 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Whoa that's making ne nauseous 😳

[–] VoxofGod@mastodon.social 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So if they don't move for me does that mean I'm dead inside?

[–] khleedril@cyberplace.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I can make them dance to music!

[–] hopeward@sfba.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Interesting, after seeing the comments about how it works for people I can make it hold still or move. It’s wild!

[–] kimlockhartga@beige.party 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Does it mean anything if they aren't moving for me, unless I scroll the image up and down? I've been told that I have field independent vision: I see parts before the whole.

[–] GRC@zirk.us 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I L L U S I O N S

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The illusion when moving it up and down does not even break when the picture is very out of focus and viewed with one eye. So there must be something fundamental about the rough shapes and/or color grading. All the fine details are irrelevant.

[–] GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I look at any one top or bottom edge and see it’s level.. but every thing less is slanted.
Arrrgh and they bobble..