this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
104 points (96.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9523 readers
133 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Cars fulfill a very self-indulgent narrative. 'I get to decide where and when I travel', makes people feel "free" snd "important" even when millions of them are silently coming to the same decisions-- like going downtown at 09:00 on weekdsys-- that allow huge efficiency plays.

Notice how many ads feature fantasies of open roads and trips to faraway attractions, not the real world of "I need to sit in rush hour traffic from 6:30 on to get to the Work Factory"

Maybe public transit needs to focus its message on the freedom from drudgery it offers-- you don't have to be staring at the driver in front of you, scanning the traffic reports

[–] psud@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Because many of us live in places where you must use a car, there are no alternatives

In such places electric public transport is nothing but a pipe dream

[–] randint@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I love trains

[–] LightDelaBlue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

since wen this sub is full of carbrain? like bruh.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah what is going on? Seems like every other comment is full on car-brain-cars-are-freedom insanity. No enough orange pilled people here. Is the opposite of the orange pill the sad grey pill?

[–] BodePlotHole@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I dunno what country you are from, but here in the US of A, the monopolies that own all the train infrastructure make sure to keep trains as public transportation as cost prohibitive as possible.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Batteries used gives you150 ebikes for every e-car

[–] OrbitalHorizon@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Public transportation in America is typically a magnet for crime.

I’ll take a hard pass on being trapped in a tube with my assailants.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Because trains aren’t economically viable for the vast majority of the US, and where they are economically they are the topic of conversation.

As far as why the conversation would center around the US, that’s just the regular American-centric tilt english conversations generally lean towards. Most of Europe has their shit together in some topics like this (public transportation, for instance) and the US is a huge consumer of automobiles and no one if building mass transit between the middle of nowhere to the other middle of nowhere where we could ‘efficiently’ move individually insignificant numbers of people at a time.

[–] Carter@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Not every journey is possible with public transport. People will still need to lug equipment about in the electric future.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they give people a lot more freedom than trains


if you own a car. If you don't own a car but live in a society where everybody else has one you are kinda screwed.

[–] bonnetbee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I know it is not necessarily your opinion, but cars don't give freedom to people - even if you own one. You pay so much for your car, the society pays a lot for the infrastructure, this infrastructure takes away the freedom from people (especially children) to live and move outside, when you drive you can (should) do nothing else, it's reputation as individual way of transport blocks expansion of public transit, ... every aspect of a car is taking freedom away from you. A car that gives people freedom is a marketing strategy and the opposite is true.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because people want a means to travel independently, as in they are in control and not riding with strangers.

/s

[–] hamid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] Crucible_Fodder@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but no train takes me from my front door to my job/the movies/my vacation place. And my car works even if the state decides to shut down the trains/buses.

[–] constnt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What if the state decides to shut down oil supply? Or the electric grid? That logic applies to cars as much as trains. Those all rely on government oversite, even when privately owned.

We decry the government, claiming it's inept. We listen to and vote in people who say the government is inept. Then when those we just voted in do a horrible job we then point at the mess and say, "see the government doesn't work". It's a self fulfilling prophecy.

[–] UhBell@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You ever try taking your new mattress and bed frame on a train?

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Always hated that argument for big cars. You buy a new bed/mattress/big furniture like once a year. Delivery is maybe 50 bucks. The extra cost of a car big enough to transport that stuff is in the thousands. Somehow everyone gets upset when confronted with delivery fees while being perfectly fine with dishing out cash for a car. Redo the fucking math.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that’s a bit of an oversimplification of the argument

I use my car to transport my bike, surfboard, skis, dog, lawnmower, buy furniture, buy lumber etc for projects, and more. It just can’t be beat in terms of convenience. For repairs around the house, gardening, etc, it’s a must-have.

A 1998 CR-V does all that and it cost me $2500. Bomb-proof b20b also, I love it. I don’t think you can beat that in terms of convenience.

I’m all for trains and buses (electric busses would be great!) but the utility wanes when lots of people bring stuff. I used to have a 45 minute bus commute, and the bus had racks for bikes. I’d bring my bike to do the 5 mile trip to and from bus stops at both ends. But lots of people wanted to do that, and you’d have to be early in line to get your bike on the bus, otherwise you had to wait for the next one. I can’t imagine people trying to bring 2x4s or potted plants on the bus! Or their pets, another issue altogether.

[–] arbitrary@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

So you'll buy an electric car for some 20k+ once that car breaks down to haul your frequent furniture and lumber purchases?

Because the discussion isn't about 'I have a car and won't exchange it for a train' but 'moving transportation onto trains instead of electric cars would be a lot more beneficial as the future of transportation'

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Funnily Ive got downvoted for bringing the same argument against replaceable phone batteries in another thread. Like, just pay a tech once every few years to do it for you.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

I did, on a trolley bus. Blocked an entire exit, but we timed it just right as to get on a mostly empty one and not inconvinience lot of people

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because cars aren't stuck to tracks.

[–] torpak@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

cars are stuck to roads and much less efficient everywhere many people need to go. cars are basically useful where only few people live or work.

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

And trains aren't stuck to roads. And planes aren't stuck to roads. And ships aren't stuck to roads.

[–] Pixlbabble@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Big Auto has been destroying any idea of high speed rails for decades. Our trains are complete trash because of car lobbyists.

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trains only run on a specified track and there isn't one near me. A car isn't bound by a track and can go anywhere.

[–] sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

and there isn’t one near me.

That's exactly the problem that this community wants to fix.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trains could have intercity connections. Walk/bus to the train, ride the train, walk/bus to your destination.

[–] Froody@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure buddy, spend a few hours hopping public transport each day is so much fun.

Cars are superior in every single way, it's paupers that cry out of jealousy we're seeing here.

They know cars aren't the problem, there are industries out there that spew out the equivalent of millions of cars but they don't bitch about that.

[–] Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

hmmm, do I want to sit in a train, flip my laptop open and do some work, then walk through a park to the office for today... Or do I want to sit in traffic and do nothing...

Tough choice there

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, I absolutely do not want to work on my way to work

[–] Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Work time starts when I open the laptop. I'm not volunteering that time, since i'm not completely insane. It makes a huge difference whether my workday starts in the office, or in the train.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it’s paupers that cry out of jealousy we’re seeing here.

Found Andrew Tate's account

[–] Froody@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Ugh, vegans.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why is it that trains are always proposed as the alternative to cars? I, for one, really want PRT to succeed. It seems to be the best middle ground between efficiency and convinience.