this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
213 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
729 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jecht360@lemmy.world 98 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If purchasing something doesn't mean you own it, then piracy isn't theft.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 66 points 9 months ago

If someone sells something to you and then takes it back later, that is theft.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 months ago

If you weren't allowed to back up a copy of it, you never owned it.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is huge and not like what happened last month.

Last month they removed access to "Deadly Dentists | Season 1" and similar shows that are also broadcasted 24/7 everywhere on TV, so not too many people "purchased" them.

But for anime the chance that a big fan is losing access to a massive collection of titles paid thousands of dollars is much higher.

Sony didn't learn from the backlash that happened less than two months ago?????

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 11 points 9 months ago

They learned that the backlash was easily ignored, most likely.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm waiting for the class action lawsuit on this.

[–] CaptObvious 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Their TOS most likely forbids class action suits. It most likely requires individual or “small batch” arbitration that benefits Sony.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Only if you file suit and the court finds it enforceable. Sometimes they say you can sue anyway.

[–] CaptObvious 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m not aware of that ever happening. It may have, but every case that I’m aware of has ended quickly with the court enforcing the TOS that users “voluntarily” deciphered and agreed to.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

One clear example in the US is "warranty void if removed" stickers. It was found that "contract" violated consumer protection laws, so companies are required to prove the customer broke it in an attempt to repair it, instead of just proving the customer attempted to repair it.

[–] CaptObvious 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Provide the case? I’m very interested to see this.

It's not a case, but action by the FTC. And here are settlements with three companies on similar grounds (conditioning warranties on the manner of repair).

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That image choice by Ars Technica was no coincidence.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 14 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Funimation, a Sony-owned streaming service for anime, recently announced that subscribers' digital libraries on the platform will be unavailable after April 2.

For years, Funimation had been telling subscribers that they could keep streaming these digital copies of purchased movies and shows, but qualifying it: “forever, but there are some restrictions.”

But in addition to offering video streaming, Funimation also dubbed and released anime as physical media, and sometimes those DVDs or Blu-rays would feature a digital code.

For people lacking the space, resources, or interest in maintaining a library of physical media, this was a good way to preserve treasured shows and movies without spending more money.

It also provided a simple way to access purchased media online if you were, for example, away on a trip and had a hankering to watch some anime DVDs you bought.

Regarding refunds, Funimation's announcement directed customers to its support team "to see the available options based on your payment method," but there's no mention of getting money back from a DVD or Blu-ray that you might not have purchased had you known you couldn't stream it "forever."


The original article contains 420 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] 20inmyhead@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

Sony is shit for doing this, however if you buy streaming content thinking you’re going to have access to it forever you’re kidding yourself. Businesses will supply streaming content for as long as it’s profitable to do so. When that profit evaporates so does your content.