this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
-25 points (26.4% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2333 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In the waning days of the Soviet Union, US propaganda mocked their gerontocracy as a sign the ruling class was so utterly detached from the needs and struggle of the common citizen.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

For good reason, we should do the same

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Biden said one of the first things he said during the meeting was “America is back,” which he said prompted a response from “Mitterrand from Germany,” before correcting it to “from France.”

“And Mitterand from Germany — I mean, from France — looked at me and said … ‘You know, what — why, how long you back for?” Biden said. “And I looked at him, and … the chancellor of Germany said, ‘What would you say, Mr. President, if you picked up the paper tomorrow in the London Times, and London Times said, “A thousand people break through the House of Commons, break down the doors, two Bobbies are killed in order to stop the election of the prime minister.” What would you say?'”

Article points out how Biden was just giving trump shit for the same thing...

So either mixing up names is bad, or it's not.

If Dems start saying it's only bad when the other team does it, then we're just as bad as republicans and the whole system is fucked.

We have to have a higher standard than "not a Republican".

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

They are just as bad as Republicans,

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

When the two of them finally do debate, the result will be reminiscent of the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Not because of the level of discourse, but because they both think they remember them.

[–] JaymesRS 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

My mom routinely calls me by my brother’s name or the dog’s name. When I passed out one time, she called my wife by the name of my first girlfriend from almost 30 years ago trying to get her attention. She’s in her young 60’s. Im in my 40’s and do it regularly with people I know.

No1curr if you goof in a speech occasionally.

The reason it matters for Trump is because he makes it a point to remind others how “smart” he is and how he aced a cognitive test. He also has a history of swapping women’s names as part of his trashing women who challenge him playbook.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hey look it's another anti-Biden post from "F Trump" user return2ozma! Bro really hates Biden and frfr no cap also hate Trump!

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago

It's political news. Surprise!

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The apparent mix-up took place during a Sunday campaign event in Las Vegas, in which Biden recounted a Group of 7 (G7) meeting he attended after being elected in 2020.

Biden said one of the first things he said during the meeting was “America is back,” which he said prompted a response from “Mitterrand from Germany,” before correcting it to “from France.”

“And I looked at him, and … the chancellor of Germany said, ‘What would you say, Mr. President, if you picked up the paper tomorrow in the London Times, and London Times said, “A thousand people break through the House of Commons, break down the doors, two Bobbies are killed in order to stop the election of the prime minister.” What would you say?

Biden’s remarks continued with criticism of former President Trump and his recent “poisoning the blood” comments he used to describe the effects of immigrants coming into the United States.

Several of his political opponents and some voters have used Biden’s apparent mix-ups and gaffes to further fuel their argument as to why he is too old or unfit to be president.

Biden’s political rival, Trump, 77, faced similar criticism last month after he appeared to mix-up his main GOP challenger, Nikki Haley, with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) while discussing the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots.


The original article contains 401 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 44%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

people misspeak. all the time. even people who are paid to talk for a living. it happen. so biden said a wrong name. it wasn't malicious and nothing of serious consequence took place and I don't think it's a biden issue mainly because biden has never made his cognition or other mental capacities an issue.

why is this different than from when trump does the same thing? trump has made his mental capacity a central part of his campaign. in effect, mental capability of the candidates is only an issue for one of the candidates, and it's the one who always brings it up. it's exactly the same as someone who makes (white christian) morality a central part of their legislative history and then it's found out that they have a long-term homosexual affair. no one cares they have a gay lover but since they make an issue about it people care that this specific person has an affair.