Selfhosted

40246 readers

538 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Keycloak - restrict access to certain applications (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago by hypertext@feddit.de to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi, I have successfully set up Keycloak and use it for a few of the applications that I'm running (unfortunately not every app supports oauth2/oidc yet).

However there's one issue I haven't been able to resolve yet: I want to restrict access to certain applications (like portainer) to specific users (me).

I've already tried going to the portainer client > Authorization, added a role based policy and added the policy to the default permission, but other users that don't have this role can still log in. If I go to "Evaluate" it gives me the expected correct result for the different users

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Keycloak claims to handle authorization, but the part that it handles goes only up to enumerating what accesses you have.

Checking those accesses and allowing or restricting the usage is up to your system.

[–] trial_and_err@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m no expert, but Keycloak is just doing authentication (does the user have a valid account?) for you. For authorisation (is the authenticated user allowed to access the site?) you could put Pomerium in front of your apps and authorise based on user groups for different paths.

Not sure about portainer though, that might be a bug?

[–] GameGod@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I have no experience with portainer, but some apps have an option to disable new user registration, and that's what I would recommend first. (I do use Keycloak myself too)

[–] woulduno@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I use specific groups within KeyCloak to define what applications I want a user to see. However, I am using Cloudflare Zero Trust and passing the group claim.