this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
205 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
3071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 82 points 10 months ago (3 children)

"As you all know, we have worked hard over the last year to run our business as sustainably as possible. Unfortunately, we still have work to do to rightsize our company and I regret having to share that we are taking the painful step to reduce our headcount by just over 500 people across Twitch," Clancy wrote.

Cripes I hate corporate newspeak. "Rightsize" isn't a word, and I hope I never encounter it again.

[–] balancedchaos@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"As 'sustainably' as possible." I love that one, because it makes it sound like they're being kind to nature.

Nope, just profit.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is twitch or prime video even profitable? I’m pretty sure twitch isn’t but prime might be just due to locking people in to making their e-commerce purchases on amazon

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

prime might be

It all depends on Amazon's accounting, and whether or not they want it to be profitable.

They can pretend that people are subscribing to prime just for the videos, and then it becomes profitable. Or, they can pretend that people are subscribing to prime for the shipping, and prime video is just a loss-leader they use to encourage people to subscribe.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

..so we can make a profit off your work.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

You're fortunate that this is the first time you're hearing it, but it's been a business term for quite some time now. I've only ever heard it used as a euphemism for downsizing but one HR lady insisted the term was general, that if you were understaffed you'd still need to right size.

I asked her if in meetings that might lead to some confusion, and she was confident that it never would. She was also an idiot.

When I started getting mentioned in meetings for doing a really good job on tasks that she was supposed to be doing she fired me. She was fired just a few weeks later. Sorry, she was right sized.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 75 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This legal responsibility to shareholder profits sure is shitting on everything else. We should change that.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

people really shouldn't get to gamble on companies and people's livelihoods

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

That's just an excuse companies make when they never had the intention of doing the right thing.

[–] prograhammingdev@lemmy.prograhamming.com 52 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right after the introduction of additional advertising pricing structure. Wow

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

That is for shareholders not employees silly.

[–] wellee@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fun reminder: Jeff Bezos makes $9.6 billion a year :)

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As in, on average his wealth increases by that much? Or that he makes that much in income?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're the same thing, and Elon buying Twitter in cash should have taught you that.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

They're not the same thing. Musk paid for twitter partially with borrowed money, partially with money raised by selling Tesla stock. The money he got when he sold that Tesla stock was income. The borrowed money wasn't.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wait, Amazon owns Twitch?

Damn, do the same 5 companies just own everything now?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Have you been living under a rock or in a comma during the past two decades? Like 5 dudes own 90% of the world.

[–] Wolpertinger@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

It's been that way for awhile.

If you have Amazon prime, you can sub to one creator a month "for free."

[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Justin sold at the right time