this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
158 points (97.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6623 readers
94 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 35 points 11 months ago

I’d put 100 on the Cessna getting a double kill before it gets smoked

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Well it looks like one of the SU-57s is already down, so the odds are looking better for Cessna!

[–] nuke@yah.lol 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The Patriot missile system watching it all go down

[–] mondo_brondo@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Would a Cessna even get off the ground with multiple AMRAAMs on its wings?

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A couple tack welds and fire off the propellant on one missile.

Modular auxiliary thruster.

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Needs more reindeer

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago
[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The famous An Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Misspelled-something...

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I bet the Grim Reapers over in DCS World would be happy to try this out.

Not sure how they'll strap AMRAAMs to a Cessna. Strap it to some P-52s

What would be more interesting would be to also supply some Patriot missle systems on both sides creating a narrow engagement zone.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

Cessnas are rugged enough, you could probably just bolt the AMRAAM attachment points to the wing and call it a day.

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Ugh. The grim reapers were a joke in my group. Cap just never shuts up.

[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 5 points 11 months ago

Messerschmitt P.1111 with V2 rockets.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That's Korea era tech. The 80s version is a twin body Beechcraft with a Phoenix missile between the bodies.