this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Technology

34877 readers
5 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wagesof@links.wageoffsite.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are they really 7nm chips tho? They do love to brand shit as other shit.

Wait until these end up in phones and have the power performance of 11nm stuff.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are really 7nm chips that are designed using a different approach, but have similar characteristics. It's kind amusing how people think that there's something magical involved in making these types of chips that would prevent China from making them.

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think hes not questioning it because china, but because nm between different fabs isnt comparible. E.g. finfet nm isnt the true nm used by older definitions of what nm means, which is why intel for instance, changed their naming on its fab process to match the rest of the industry. (E.g "Intel 7" is actually a well processed 10nm traditional definition chip that has that name because its conparible to TSMC 7nm)

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

We'll see what the performance is like when the chips start making their way to the market.

[–] wagesof@links.wageoffsite.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is. The uv lithography that China cannot buy is literally the magic.

[–] CoffeeBot@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article doesn’t really go into it but what’s a typical yield for chips like that? That’s great they’re on a smaller dye but if you’re trashing half of them it seems you’re not quite there yet.

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It seems pretty poor, especially for 2023. This article from four years ago has TSMC touting an 80% yield rate on their new-at-the-time 5nm process. Still, the fact that Huawei is able to produce 7nm parts at all is something of a victory. Huawei is probably around five years behind TSMC at this point but may be able to close that gap over time.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

If you're trashing half of them, that's just means fabrication is more expensive. This seems to be an acceptable cost for Huawei, and I imagine SMIC will get subsidies to offset the cost in the short term. The important part is that SMIC can now produce commercially viable 7nm chips domestically, and they're only going to get better at doing it going forward.

load more comments
view more: next ›