this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
146 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59300 readers
4940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Boeing has now lost $1.1 billion on Starliner, with no crew flight in sight::"We're not really ready to talk about a launch opportunity yet."

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rapscallion@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract, as part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

There’s one piece of good news, unless you’re a Boeing shareholder. That aside it’s sad that a former engineering powerhouse like them just lurches from disaster to disaster these days.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

You're reply is almost word for word what I was going to say. They used to be an engineering company, but once the goddamn marketers and business fucks take over, they tend to ruin everything. HP used to be the same thing. And a whole host of other companies that no longer exist.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Unless you're a Boeing shareholder" :-(

I bought a few shares of Boeing just before their 737 MAX debacle, and then COVID hit straight after. I thought things might turn around, so I'm apparently just holding the bag until they screw up so badly that I can buy the entire company.

Edit: I'm glad this is happening how it is. I'd rather my Boeing shares went to zero than have NASA be held responsible and everyone pay more tax to bail out Boeing.

[–] byrona@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Won't anyone think of the shareholders?!

[–] LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does Boeing have any recent projects that are an unmitigated success? Everything I see from them is about a new project being a disaster in some manner.

[–] SilentSilhouette@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

The fact they are even running is quiet surprising. The demographic of Boeing had an average age around 60 change to around 30 In A matter of 5 years. The amount of experience lost is crazy.

[–] soviettaters@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 777X is moving along, albeit somewhat slowly. Boeing has just been limping along.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That’s not an encouraging thought. After the MAX debacle it’s hard to imagine Boeing not launching another death machine. I’ll be sure to steer clear of their new fancy plane.

[–] supercriticalcheese@feddit.it 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

During a normal flight, these substandard links would not be an issue. But Starliner's parachute system is designed to land a crew safely in case one of the three parachutes fails. However, due to the lower failure load limit with these soft links, if one parachute fails, it's possible the lines between the spacecraft and its remaining two parachutes would snap due to the extra strain.

The second issue involves P-213 glass cloth tape that is wrapped around wiring harnesses throughout the vehicle. These cables run everywhere, and Nappi said there are hundreds of feet of these wiring harnesses. The tape is intended to protect the wiring from nicks. However, during recent tests, it was discovered that under certain circumstances possible in flight, this tape is flammable.

I cannot imagine these two are insomourtable, but it also depends on how likely are these to occur in practice.

[–] Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

From what I saw, part of the issue is that P-212 glass cloth isn't flammable, implying that there was a mistake in ordering or using P-213 instead.

As for how likely they are, spacecraft carry a pure oxygen supply and fires are one of the most dangerous things that can occur. Astronauts have died on the ground in training capsules that ignited, after which NASA paid close attention to any potential risk. As for the parachute, I don't know how likely they are to fail, but it effectively changes from a point of failure with one redundancy (can lose one chute, but still land) to a single point of failure that would result in the death of all astronauts aboard if it failed. NASA's pretty good about making sure that astronauts never die from something that could have been planned for.

[–] Designate6361@lemmy.letthewookiee.win 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disappointing, was keen to see how the starliner went. Everyone seems to be putting there eggs in the starship basket

[–] MrJ2k@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Starship is the sequel!

This was supposed to be Boeing's crew Dragon rival. Meanwhile, that thing has flown like 10 crew missions, plus cargo supply missions already.

Though it's a very good thing that Dragon is a completely different architecture to Starship, even if they are both SpaceX.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Boeing is a disaster. If the MAX story isn’t enough to demonstrate how incompetent these idiots are then I don’t know what to tell you.

Nothing good will come of this.

[–] Jay212127@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wonder if they are re-taping it or not.

[–] SaveComengs@lemmy.federa.net 1 points 1 year ago

yoo it's everyone 's favourite war criminal eric berger

load more comments
view more: next ›