this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
80 points (98.8% liked)

United Kingdom

4083 readers
246 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The British were once admired for their statesmanship and tolerance... all gone under Conservative leadership.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is the plan here to just make the country so utterly shit that Labour have to spend their first stint back in charge undoing everything?

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

You think Starmer Chameleon would undo any of this?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 1 year ago

I imagine this would count anyone advocating rejoining the EU (“you don’t believe in Britain and its glorious destiny; sedition!”)

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

We're fine the UK under tory rule has no values

[–] butterypowered@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

Goodbye independence marches too then.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Remember, remember

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

America's liberal interpretation of the 1st Amendment has fucked us in a lot of ways, but it would protect us from authoritarian shit like this.

[–] Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Banning peaceful protests is the first step to mass riots

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Government officials have drawn up deeply controversial proposals to broaden the definition of extremism to include anyone who “undermines” the country’s institutions and its values, according to documents seen by the Observer.

The new definition, prepared by civil servants working for cabinet minister Michael Gove, is fiercely opposed by a cohort of officials who fear legitimate groups and individuals will be branded extremists.

Among them are the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), Palestine Action and Mend, which has featured at some Conservative party conference fringe events and in 2021 provided evidence to parliamentary committees.

The definition of extremism and its usage in counter-terrorism policies like [counter terrorism strategy] Prevent is already being applied so broadly it seeks to effectively hinder people from organising and mobilising.

The government’s 2011 Prevent strategy defined extremism as the “active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and the mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs”.

Under the proposed definition in the documents, extremism would be the promotion of any ideology which aims to “overturn or undermine the UK’s democracy, its institutions and values; or threaten the rights of individuals or create a permissive environment for radicalisation, hate crime and terrorism”.


The original article contains 901 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!