this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
149 points (98.1% liked)

BrainWorms

1227 readers
19 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheWorstNL@lemmy.world 158 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Payment providers should not be able to control what users are or are not allowed to purchase with their cards. It's a downward spiral. Electronic payment is a necessity in nowadays life.

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As long as it's a legal transaction, the providers should STFU.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 56 points 1 year ago

Payment processors have a functional monopoly and should not be permitted to refuse or otherwise be punitive to any category of purchase.

[–] N00dle@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is lame. Mastercard telling people what not to by is outrageous but not the first time they've done this.

[–] DagonPie@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What else have they done? I had no idea this was even legal.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

they did it with pornhub at least

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Onlyfans too

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I'm going to make it a goal to stop using these companies. I think credit cards should be banned as predatory actually, or at least heavily restricted.

[–] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

These aren't credit cards, but debit cards. It's access to money you have already earned, is in the bank, you own, and Mastercard is saying you can't spend it on a particular thing. You get around this by doing an ATM cash withdrawal, but it's still an extra step, and it's still a megacorp restricting your access to something that the law does not.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And you’ll have to pay the atm fee as a punishment for using cash

[–] fuzzzerd@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bold move to assume they'll take cash. Many places gave up on cash during the pandemic and many of those haven't gone back to taking cash.

I used to hate the "convince" fee companies charged for using a credit card, but when it's reframed as a cash discount, it's not as aggravating.

That said, plenty of places are electronic payment only these days. Scary times, given the payment processor monopoly and their ability to determine what you can and can't buy.

[–] WookieMunster@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All dispensaries around my area take cash. There’s a couple of them that are cash only

[–] digitalgadget@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I was amazed the first time I found one that took plastic.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If payment processers are blocking these payments, then yes, dispensaries will start accepting cash. They'd be suicidal not to.

[–] kitonthenet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Usually (in my experience) the weed store just has an ATM in it, or the POS system is technically an ATM

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's access to money you have already earned, is in the bank, you own, and Mastercard is saying you can’t spend it on a particular thing.

Strictly speaking, they're saying that they won't facilitate the transaction themselves, presumably because they're concerned about legal exposure from processing transactions for goods that are illegal under federal law. State law may not be restricting your access, but federal still is, at least on paper, even if it's largely de facto unenforced.

Mastercard makes money every time you swipe a card. They're not going to cut off their own income unless they think the cost of not doing doing so is higher, such as legal exposure.

I agree that I don't love how much control a few private companies have over the financial system, but at least with this case, I think the real issue is Congress for not getting around to legalizing Marijuana.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Well, they can't stop a cash withdrawal on your card to pay for it. So, it appears they still have to pay for it in a way.

[–] Cybermass@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's a very dumb business move, it might be illegal for then to do that in Canada

[–] LordPassionFruit@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It should be illegal for a company to limit what you can purchase anywhere in the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's nothing illegal about them blocking illegal purchases on their cards, of which the US federal government still considera marijuana illegal

[–] Cybermass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Re read my comment

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I only skimmed the article but it seemed US centric so I'd guess this is relevant to the US since it's not legal federally there. I was worried for a moment since I use one for my orders in Canada. Though if for some reason does happen in Canada I'm sure there'll still be some way to do online orders like with Interac or another company. Too much tax money collected for the Canadian government to just let an online revenue stream dry up from a credit lender.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

This was a maneuver by VISA and MC in the Aughts when Wikileaks was publishing information embarrassing to the US Federal Government.

Pharmacies and medical doctors have long been creative about preserving privacy. Dispensaries will go back to selling tea or candy or miscellaneous OTC pharmacological product which they've been doing since prohibition if not before.

[–] HowMany@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Cannabis users should move to ban Mastercard.

[–] noredcandy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the article: "The federal government considers cannabis sales illegal, so these purchases are not allowed on our systems," the spokesperson added.

Seems like this isn’t a Mastercard thing, but a government thing. Marijuana is still illegal at the inter-state level unfortunately.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that hasnt been being enforced for a long time, so if something's changed it'd help Mastercard's PR quite a bit to point to a government order or something.

Otherwise yeah it's a mastercard thing

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's still a non-trivial legal liability that any major company would prefer to not have.

If you could spend $1 to eliminate a 1% chance that you're going to be arrested, you're probably gonna take it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

You'll not stop me! I'll just withdraw money from an ATM, and what I do with that is nacho business.

[–] xeekei@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

And over here in Sweden we're 99% cash-less at the moment. I tried to warn as many as possible that we do not want to give up transactional independence.

[–] kitonthenet@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Ok, I’ll just switch, they already ban porn purchases 👍

[–] bigb5wm@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I didn't even think you were allowed to use debit cards or credit cards to buy weed.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›