Thank you so much for sharing the results. Very interesting to see the outcome after participating in the survey.
Out of interest: do you know how many participants came from Lemmy compared to other platforms?
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Thank you so much for sharing the results. Very interesting to see the outcome after participating in the survey.
Out of interest: do you know how many participants came from Lemmy compared to other platforms?
No idea, but I would assume most results are from here since Lemmy is where I got the most attention and feedback.
I guess I should feel good with my 12/20 since it's better than average.
What I learnt is that I’m bad at that task.
I did 12 and I thought it was a pretty bad result. Apparently I was wrong!
I tried to answer by instinct, without careful examination, to make it more realistic
15 here and when I reviewed the answers I realized most were sheer luck.
The fact that it's a clean gaussian shows that it's mostly luck anyway.
It'd be interesting to also see the two non-AI images the most people thought were.
I got 11/20 and there were a couple of guesses in there that I got right and wrong. Funny how there are some man-made ones that seem like AI. I think it's the blurry/fuzziness maybe?
Interesting. So you've given us a 50/ 50 chance. Usually you've given us the art that was used and then the AI has attempted it's own version? Did you train the ai using the art ?
Are you allowed to do that ? Is the art in the public sphere?
I have no knowledge or understanding of ai.
No, the AI didn't try to copy the other art that was included. I also don't train the model myself, I just tell it to create an image similar to another one. For example the fourth picture I told it to create a rough sketch of a person sitting on a bench using an ink pen, then I went online and looked for a human-made one that's of a similar style.
Ah ok. So it didn't use those images to train on. Were those images hard to find ? Does it tell you what it uses to train ?
I would second the comment from the original post which said that they didn't pay much attention in the latter half.
Oof. I got about 65% on the images I hadn’t seen in the post. I must be pretty close to being replaceable by an adversarial network.
Is there any chance that the human artists experimented with AI and posted the result along with their usual work? :)
To me 4 was pretty obvious as a lot of the lines made no sense, such as the ones right below her face.
Also, is there a correlation between image generator and accuracy?