Russo wrote that the issue is not unique to Cottonwood Heights, and they're trying to better understand its intent.
The intent is for the bike lane to be clear of obstructions, dumbass.
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
Russo wrote that the issue is not unique to Cottonwood Heights, and they're trying to better understand its intent.
The intent is for the bike lane to be clear of obstructions, dumbass.
Yep. We celebrated this win since there were other bills this session which make it harder for salt lake city to build more bike lanes. And this jackass doesn't understand a clearly worded law. Can't catch a break.
He absolutely understanding it. Russo said that a lot of people wanted the law enforced as soon as it was enacted, then gave reasons against it without saying anyone brought those issues up to him. Those are things he is bringing up, not residents.
He just doesn't want to enforce the law.
“Why care about the safety of people on bikes? I drive a car, so I really don’t understand.”
-Police chief
Oh, laws are optional now? Cool.
We all knew since the pandemic: Despite the police often telling us otherwise, they do get to decide which laws they enforce.
A few ideas:
Would he enforse bikes parked in the car lane.
Oh yes. With lethal force.
The police where I live is doing prevention by telling cyclists to be careful because they could traumatize a poor car driver when hitting them.
You might dent the bonnet with your head. Also blood doesn't wipe of easy.
Aw geez. If only there was something a person could do if they don't want to do their job anymore.
So what he's saying is that drivers should prepare to have their mirrors broken?
That's how I heard it.
Totally by accident, of course. I mean, what are illegally parked drivers going to do? Complain to police? 🤭
In our current timeline they would, and they'll avoid the ticket and get the cyclist charged with "assault on a motor vehicle". Then the cop will break the reflectors on the bike and find any relevant laws to try to ticket the cyclists, even issuing a hand written note that says they are suspended from cycling for 90 days.
If only there was a convenient way to inconvenie--
Slash the tyres.
The newsletter they reference is ever funnier.
OMG, I'm trying to enjoy my vacation and I make the mistake of checking the news and seeing my police chief being a complete tool... again.
Russo is also infamous for stalking a city council member by parking at her house every night. He was dismissed from his previous department for very controversial reasons. He's the reason I gag every time I pay property taxes. We'd actually have a fairly progressive district (for Utah) if it wasn't for this ass-hat and the general car-brainedness of our city council.
Imagine states restricting sidewalks and trails, and then ontop of that not enforcing laws that prevent individual instructing those same sidewalk or trails.
Infrastructure should not only designed for cars.