this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
173 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12637 readers
945 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Russo wrote that the issue is not unique to Cottonwood Heights, and they're trying to better understand its intent.

The intent is for the bike lane to be clear of obstructions, dumbass.

[–] hash@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yep. We celebrated this win since there were other bills this session which make it harder for salt lake city to build more bike lanes. And this jackass doesn't understand a clearly worded law. Can't catch a break.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

He absolutely understanding it. Russo said that a lot of people wanted the law enforced as soon as it was enacted, then gave reasons against it without saying anyone brought those issues up to him. Those are things he is bringing up, not residents.

He just doesn't want to enforce the law.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 3 days ago

“Why care about the safety of people on bikes? I drive a car, so I really don’t understand.”

-Police chief

[–] Ixoid@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, laws are optional now? Cool.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

We all knew since the pandemic: Despite the police often telling us otherwise, they do get to decide which laws they enforce.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

A few ideas:

  • make it so bikelanes are in between the sidewalk and the like of parked cars. Common in Montreal.
  • make the cops go on patrol on bikes
  • if enforcement of bikelanes is optional, so should be enforcement of bikes on sidewalks
[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Would he enforse bikes parked in the car lane.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Oh yes. With lethal force.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The police where I live is doing prevention by telling cyclists to be careful because they could traumatize a poor car driver when hitting them.

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 11 points 3 days ago

You might dent the bonnet with your head. Also blood doesn't wipe of easy.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Aw geez. If only there was something a person could do if they don't want to do their job anymore.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So what he's saying is that drivers should prepare to have their mirrors broken?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Totally by accident, of course. I mean, what are illegally parked drivers going to do? Complain to police? 🤭

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In our current timeline they would, and they'll avoid the ticket and get the cyclist charged with "assault on a motor vehicle". Then the cop will break the reflectors on the bike and find any relevant laws to try to ticket the cyclists, even issuing a hand written note that says they are suspended from cycling for 90 days.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago

If only there was a convenient way to inconvenie--

Slash the tyres.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

The newsletter they reference is ever funnier.

  • First, the Chief looks like biking isn't an activity he does regularly, so perhaps not a well-informed opinion there.
  • Second, there is a picture of a vehicle blocking a bike lane which appears to be used as an example of the problem. Of course, this vehicle is parked so far from the curb that it should probably be ticketed anyways.
  • Third, the area they use as an example is in front of a high school that appears to have been widened specifically to create a drop-off area. Unless you literally parked too far over, you wouldn't interfere with the bike lane at all. Toss in some concrete bollards and this problem goes away.
  • Fourth, the school has a fucking drop off in the parking lot just beyond that spot, so its not like there is no alternative!
[–] foenix@lemmy.radio 6 points 2 days ago

OMG, I'm trying to enjoy my vacation and I make the mistake of checking the news and seeing my police chief being a complete tool... again.

Russo is also infamous for stalking a city council member by parking at her house every night. He was dismissed from his previous department for very controversial reasons. He's the reason I gag every time I pay property taxes. We'd actually have a fairly progressive district (for Utah) if it wasn't for this ass-hat and the general car-brainedness of our city council.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Imagine states restricting sidewalks and trails, and then ontop of that not enforcing laws that prevent individual instructing those same sidewalk or trails.

Infrastructure should not only designed for cars.