this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
191 points (96.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33430 readers
1551 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Somewhere along the line Brave tricked people into thinking they weren't owned by a couple of really bigoted dudes.

In fairness Brian Bondy might be a good dude, but Brendan Eich sucks.

[–] UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Do you have a source that resumes everything bad about Brave in one neat package ? I am tired of searching for sources everywhere and not finding everything I need each time someone ask me about it

[–] CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world 123 points 5 days ago (19 children)

I can't answer that question but I've always wondered why anyone switches to Brave. I installed it a few years ago because I heard it was privacy focused and it immediately hit me with a bunch of shit about crypto and rewards or something. I uninstalled it immediately.

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

Because it is still Chromium based and it means it is fast on Android, plus it comes packed with an adblocker by default which works wonders in closed out systems like iOS, also as many browsers (not all of them) it supports account syncing which it is always a nice plus (I can use a good working version of Brave in all the systems and keep a good flow for example).

I main Firefox in pretty much all the systems, but the Android app is missing a lot of features like tab management, and the iOS client just sucks (Brave works better there despite being Safari based too).

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 111 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Brave falls under "security theatre" and is absolutely useless

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 97 points 5 days ago (9 children)

And run by a homophobic crypto bro.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Who also inflicted Javascript upon the world, the incompetent piece of shit.

I won't say that's worse than the homophobia because I don't want to seem dismissive about oppression of queer folks, but it sure as Hell isn't better, either!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Firefox is some other type of engine that renders pages differently and doesn't always work the same but brave has Chrome underneath it so it's the same thing and it's fine and uses all the same extensions and you like it

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 10 points 4 days ago

No idea it's been plain to me is Brave is kind of dodgy to the point I've never even tried it.

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A good chunk of websites are just broken with Firefox and their not even broken in obvious ways. Some times they fail to load, sometimes they render weirdly, sometimes their just unresponsive. I use Firefox as my main browser but I always have something chromium based as my backup for when a website I wanna use just doesn't work. A lot of the time I don't even think to use it and assume the site would be broken on chromium as well but nope. Its almost always Firefox:/.

[–] 1stQ@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

Haven't had trouble with Firefox for a long time. Sure, I also have chrome sitting somewhere on the hard drive as a backup but didn't need to use it for months if not years. Started to use Waterfox on one pc and I'm happy with that one too.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Can you give any examples where we can see these differences?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

promotion, especially as a 'security focused' browser with 'uncommon' features.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

cause most people just google a chrome alternative. they dont do research. brave gives them a surafce level adblocking, and they feel fine with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shrugs@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago (1 children)

SCNR if they were able to make good decisions, they would never have switched to chrome anyway. /s

tbh, i don't get all the mozilla/firefox hate. even "the linux project" missed the mark by a mile with his firefox critique.

whatever mozilla does, it's not even half as evil as google

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

I wanted to try Brave a couple of years ago. I ran the installer, and it was one of those pieces of shit installers that just goes ahead and installs without any input from the user, dumping god knows what onto your system, and it puts everything in some obscure AppData subdirectory that can't be deduced without right-clicking the desktop shortcut. I uninstalled it without even launching it once.

If a user is 50/50 on whether or not they just installed malware, you might wanna check your programming practices.

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Well reading comments here has me going to download Vivaldi to replace Brave.

Thank y'all!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Firefox is my main browser but there's a few specific things that only work in chromium.
People will use whatever works for them.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Because vanilla Firefox has to be tinkered with to get the best out of it and the average user is not able to do it

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

As a user of Firefox from 1-3 and quantum to current.... What exactly are you tinkering with? Install ublock and be done.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

In what way?

I switched recently to Librewolf, but as a long time Firefox user (of which Librewolf is a fork anyway) it didn't seem unusable out of the box. There are some settings for privacy and studies etc you mght want to change, but they are all very obvious in the GUI preferences.

I did personally go into about:config to set a few things, like not allowing searches from the address bar because I'm weird, but what makes Firefox no good for the average user?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Any more so than vanilla Chrome?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›