this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
1047 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2664 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pope Francis made his strongest statements yet about climate change Wednesday, rebuking fossil fuel companies and urging countries to make an immediate transition to renewable energy.

In a new document titled “Laudate Deum,” or “Praise God,” the pope criticizes oil and gas companies for greenwashing new fossil fuel projects and calls for more ambitious efforts in the West to tackle the climate crisis. In the landmark apostolic exhortation, a form of papal writing, Francis says that “avoiding an increase of a tenth of a degree in the global temperature would already suffice to alleviate some suffering for many people.”

“Laudate Deum” is a follow-up to the pope’s 2015 encyclical on climate change, known as “Laudato Si’,” which lamented the exploitation of the planet and cast the protection of the environment as a moral imperative. When it was released, “Laudato Si’” was viewed as an extraordinary move by the head of the Catholic Church to address global warming and its consequences.

Nearly a decade later, the pope’s message has taken on new urgency.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 247 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Imagine being called too slow to accept new ideas by the fucking pope

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For papal standards, Francis is quite progressive.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean he picked Francis as his name for a reason, and compared to all the last ones who declared themselves strong leaders of God's might I will take someone that cares about plants and animals

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yes, he was even recognizing sexual abuse within church. Didn't do jack shit to prevent it, just recognized it. Give them another 600 years and thousands of ruined lives. They'll self-correct by then.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VinnieFarsheds@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[–] MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (9 children)

When the Catholic Church stops covering up the rampant sexual abuse and money grubbing cash grab scam operations then maybe I'll give two flying shits about what the Pope has to say.

[–] RobMyBot@lemmy.ml 105 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People tend to overlook the fact that the words of someone with this level of influence are vitally important and can have enormous effects on the world.

Whether you in particular care about a famous/rich person's comments or not, there are millions that do--and that is important. Important enough that even without respecting that person, we should always take what they say and do very seriously.

[–] MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You bring up a valid point so I won't debate. I still despise the institution that he represents and hope it all burns to the ground though.

[–] RobMyBot@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Lifebandit666@feddit.uk 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I really enjoyed this comment chain. Fuck organised religions, and this one in particular.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BB69@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s fine you don’t care, but there’s something like 1.4 billion Catholics that probably do.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most Catholics don't listen to the Pope. The Pope says Catholics must accept gay people, but go to the third world or central america and see if Catholics follow that one.

[–] Lifebandit666@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago

The Pope says Catholics must accept Gay people, but won't give them the same right to marriage as straight people. Hypocrisy, although I guess he's probably worried all his clergy will try and marry the kids they're abusing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (36 children)

News about what the head of the Catholic church does is as important as news about what the head of USA, China or Russia does. It's hugely influencial even when it comes to lives of non-catholics, non-americans, non-chinese... because of the massive number of people that belong to the religion or state and the power that religion or state has. It's a good thing the pope talks against fossil fuel companies, because his influence is big.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Many times the victims of priest sexual abuse have approached the Vatican for a meeting and blessing from the pope. Every time the pope has turned them away and refused to even acknowledge their existence, or their plight. His lawyers tell him it's not a good idea. And of course the representative of god, flanked by lawyers and bankers, listens to his lawyers over god.

[–] Nahvi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Every time the pope has turned them away and refused to even acknowledge their existence

Where did you hear that? These articles seem to say the opposite.

Monday’s meeting between Francis and the six victims of church sexual abuse was not the first such meeting between a pontiff and survivors, but it was the first of Francis’ papacy.

2014 - https://www.cnn.com/2014/07/07/world/pope-clerical-sex-abuse/

“God weeps” for the sexual abuse of children, Pope Francis said Sunday in Philadelphia, after meeting with victims of sexual abuse.

2015 - https://www.cnn.com/2015/09/27/us/pope-francis-sex-abuse-victims/index.html

Pope Francis said he regularly meets with victims of sexual abuse on Fridays, and that while the percentage of priests who abuse is relatively low, even one is too many.

2018 - https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/37774/pope-francis-regularly-meets-with-abuse-victims-on-fridays

In the evening of the same day, Pope Francis held an audience with Portugese victims of sexual abuse by the Catholic Church.

2023 - https://www.foxnews.com/world/pope-francis-holds-private-meetings-sex-abuse-victims-ukrainian-pilgrims

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If only the church had billions of dollars to fight the evils of the world like hunger, homelessness, and pedos just to name a few.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 20 points 1 year ago

Or you had the power to publicly shame Catholic leaders and say "you can't get into heaven until you stop sucking so bad"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] query@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oil companies will default to doing anything that makes them money. Governments need to make climate forcing cost them more than their revenue.

[–] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Exactly. US oil companies won't voluntarily "go green" unless it is more profitable to do so.

I was a production engineer at a US oil company for 5 years and each week I was instructed to calculate what the maximum amount of natural gas each well was allowed to flare while staying exactly below the legal limit. This is natural gas which cannot be sold so it is burned on-site which produces less greenhouse gases than just releasing it to the atmosphere.

Essentially, I was helping them pollute the maximum legal amount in order to maximize profit from the oil production. The gas pipelines hadn't been built yet but the oil company didn't want to wait for that since the oil is more valuable. This was A LOT of gas being burned. The fire balls were enormous and roared, sounding like a helicopter or jet engine at times.

Everything in the company worked this way. Old wells didn't get plugged and cleaned up until the local state government threatened fines. Leaks and spills were only monitored as closely as they were because the state had inspectors going around issuing hefty fines.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is the truth that people are too emotional to accept. I do air permitting and also spend every day calculating the "maximum allowable pollution" a site can produce while keeping it within applicable regulatory limits. Even if the CEO was like "alright, time to go green!" and devotes 100% of the profits to operating "green", they'll just get sued by the shareholders and be bankrupt or go to jail. Even if there are no shareholders, their operating costs will skyrocket and they'll be put out of business by the company next door, or even just Saud Arabia.

Passing government regulation is the only way. But we are also operating in a global economy, so you might just end up destroying your entire oil business in the process, sending all of that marketshare to places with even -worse- environmental regulation. Which just comes back to us anyways in the grand scheme of things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fucking hell. All the simple minded people in these comments who have no sense of nuance or incremental benefits... nothing will ever be perfect enough for them and they will be just as helpful for fixing the messes of our society as the ones who deny it at this rate.

Yeah it's a little and yeah it's late but it's something and he can be right about this and problematic elsewhere. Not everything can be solved with the mindset of an 8 year old who thinks people are either good or evil

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I think all the hate is justified. Pope has been quick to point fingers in various directions for a while now but he never moved a step to fix issues in his own yard making whole church extremely hypocritical.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is he the same guy who refused to condemn Russia for invasion?

[–] stown@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nah, I'm pretty sure he was feuding with the head of the Russian Orthodox Church over it, even called him an alter boy.

[–] nocturne213@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

even called him and alter boy.

That is a real pain in the ass insult.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That'll tell those oil companies to stop making record profits!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago

If I didn't know better, I'd think he was running for reelection.

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Way too little, way too late.

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"POPE CALLS FOR NATIONS TO IMPOSE 1000% TAX ON CARBON, ACCELERATE TRANSITION TO RENEWABLES", said no pope ever, to anyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Weak sauce from pontifex….. needs to be more biblical.

“Plagues floods etc - something something Almighty vengeance …. Blah blah…. Shaming not only us but god himself…… bathe in holy fires etc etc. …..purge before resetting Amen “”

That got shit done in the olden days .

[–] Crampon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do the press even care what the pope says.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Because millions and millions of people care?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Good for Pope Francis.

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Same could be said about his religions action on molestation.

load more comments
view more: next ›