this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
1100 points (93.9% liked)

Fuck AI

3389 readers
2217 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

I delivered pizza during COVID and most people I worked with couldn't follow simple directions to an address or read a road map. If a destination didn't show up on their cellphone's navigation then they were immediately and hopelessly lost.

If you don't use and exercise your brain then it atrophies and dies. AI is going turn a lot of people into conscious vegetables.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need to teach people curiosity. I use my GPS all the time because of construction and stuff but I also look at the route before I leave so that I know where I’m headed on my own, too. Meanwhile I know people who’ve lived in a city for decades and still can’t get around it without help.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We need to teach people curiosity.

This is called being a lifelong learner. Learning something new every week, or even daily, no matter how small, will always improve your life. It keeps your mind active and it adds to your problem solving.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Absolutely.

Thinking about it, our school systems do prioritize memorizing just enough information to pass a test and then people just kinda forget it all because they didn’t really get a chance to internalize it. The best teacher I ever had earned that title from me because he took the main curriculum and threw it out, teaching us instead how to be comfortable and confident with the CAD program. When the other class, taught by the moron who wrote the curriculum, even, joined us the semester after they basically had to be retaught because they retained nothing over the Christmas break and the rest of us kinda just sat there until they figured it out.

It ends up discouraging “frivilous” learning, demanding we learn not only specific stuff but so much of it that there’s no way we can actually absorb it. It’s the difference between letting a sponge soak in a bucket and just dipping it in the ocean.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have this problem with a bunch of new hires. I'll show them another way to do something and they'll ask, oh where was that written down? I said Just think about what I just did and how it makes sense, its not written down this is a neat trick i'm showing you. I swear there is no creativity or critical thinking anymore, just a bunch of automatons that follow protocol to the letter and the second there is a situation outside those very narrow parameters they just implode. Someone had to figure all of this out at one point and make the protocol in the first place, sometimes there is no step by step guide and you need to exercise judgement and make some decisions on your own.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Humans are unlearning how to adapt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ElfWord@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (28 children)

This is such a weird take.

Oh poor baby, you need a wittle spell check to make sure you don't mess up the words in your important email?

Oh little loser, you gotta have an automatic transmission to make the car go vroom vroom?

Oh Mr. has-a-life, you have to pull out Shazam instead of knowing 8 million songs by heart?

All of us use technology to make our lives easier, to supplement skills we don't want to sink perfectionist-level time into, to enjoy "good enough" results in one area or another.

This kind of holier-than-thou hyperbolic snobbery does nothing to generate actual thoughtful reflection of where to draw the line with technology dependence and only distracts and detracts from actually good critiques of generative AI's ethics and other negative effects. I wish this sub didn't allow low-effort meme posts because it's such a brain rot circle-jerk.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago

What do you mean "don't want"?

ChaosGPT, build me a time machine!

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You said something here that is pertinent, but also revealing. We all use technology everyday to make our lives easier, but does it? The automatic transmission cited above allowed anyone with a pulse the ability to get behind the wheel of a car rather than putting in any effort to acquire the skill to operate a motor vehicle. Great for the people who built our car-ciety, we have all suffered for it, including inaccessible essential services w/o one and getting stuck in traffic caused in the most part by people who should never be behind a wheel of a car. Do you want people writing books and creating art that have no business writing books or creating art? Cause we've got that now. Great...

[–] ElfWord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

We all use technology everyday to make our lives easier, but does it?

🙄 Yes. If you disagree with something this obvious, please write me a lengthy letter explaining why and send it by horse & buggy mail carrier. I promise, I'll read and respond just as soon as I'm able.

Do you want people writing books and creating art that have no business writing books or creating art?

🤮🤮🤮 Maybe we should require an intelligence test before allowing people to post their opinions on the internet too? Or have children?

If you actually think that disallowing some people to create art because they aren't "good enough," then you aren't really defending art or artists at all.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

bruh, it's literally a mockery. they are mocking the ineptitude of people who use AI.

way to overanalyze a tweet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 92 points 2 days ago (23 children)

Love it.

Steve Jobs once called the personal computer a bicycle for the mind; ChatGPT is a wheelchair for the mind. There is no shame in using a wheelchair if you need one, but if you don’t need one and use one anyway, you will come to need it.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

Steve Jobs also thought eating fruit could cure cancer...

I'd say chatgpt is more like a self-driving tesla stuck in huge traffic. you don't have any control, it can break down easily, you're moving slower than a bike, all the while thinking that people who chose the bike to avoid the traffic are losers.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can it maybe just give her an orgasm for me? I'm way to lazy to do it myself.

/it's sarcasm, you dumb fuck

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

me doublefisting magic wands

[–] msage@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They will monetize those chatbots.

And I want to see how many will pull out their wallet when it happens.

And I worry it will be almost every hardcore user, for the fear of being left out and performing worse than anyone else.

The trap is set, it has sprung, and now we wait will the owner comes for the feast.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They will monetize those chatbots.

They already did? They have premium plans, pro plans, free plans, etc.

[–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean they will disable the free version.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Watch Wall-e to remind society how lazy and dependent on AI can end up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I will honestly not be surprised if in a few years we have young to middle aged people who have become so dependent on "AI" that they'll be forced into assisted living homes because they are unable to function without it.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ehhhh. Sorta? Not in the way that I think you think. This will be a thing, but it'll be for people who were otherwise mentally disabled.

You'd be surprised the mental diversity of adults, especially in the US. Like apparently some fraction of adults with a whole number on the denominator are functionally illiterate, yet they don't need assisted living homes.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

As if the USA would provide that service for them. Many people do need help but instead live in squalor and are often only cared for, if at all, by burnt-out family members while everyone involved lives well below the poverty line.

It’s not a good place.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

I almost spit out my breakfast in laughter. Thanks for this one, OP. 😂

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›