this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
753 points (98.2% liked)

Political Memes

8875 readers
1208 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the commies and socialists will steal your guns, turn your kids gay, have state funded abortions, twerk, eat hot chips and lie if you don’t vote red.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eating hot chips and twerking sounds like a recipe for a Pollock mud mask to the front three rows.

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gallagher fans are prepared

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

I mean, they paid for a ticket to a shitshow, so that tracks.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 49 points 1 week ago (7 children)

General strike is still legal and more efficient than not paying taxes which will land you in jail. Withhold the means of production long enough and Trump might just fall out a window.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"still legal"

Since when has that ever mattered? Remember, the first unions and labor strikes weren't legal but that didn't stop them. They didn't become legal until we forced the State to meet us on equal terms.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also, the Constitution doesn't matter anymore and crime is legal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And quick reminder that the IWW will help anyone (including you, dear reader) unionize their job, no matter what it is, and even if you can only get one or two others on board with you!

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Its crazy to me that its incredibly hard to convince Americans not to go to work.

Do they think the police are going to evicted 1/3 of the population? (Assuming we were wildly successful)

Do they think the government wont recognize how important it will be to stabilize the workforce and offer relief, lest risk more strikes?

Do they think, myself, your neighbor, wont empty my pantry so you can be fed another day and we can carry on?

The only problem is you thinking you need to sit it out. Its the exact opposite, if you cant afford to strike youre the one who needs to fight. Youre the one who is getting fucked the hardest.

Yes, we need to meet a threshold to where we cant be ignored. No its not easy, but look at the alternatives. Carryon like this until we are actual slaves to disgusting GOP masters (Id rather be dead) spit. Open war against the world's most advanced military?

No, cut off the corporations and make them answer to you. After all, they are you.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 6 points 1 week ago

To me it's a no brainer and the last option before armed revolution. As JFK once said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because federal thugs and hackers will garnish your wages and steal your property if you do not.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah... I see a lot of internet tough guys on lemmy talking about how they're gonna stop paying federal taxes. I think they're in for a rude awakening if any of them actually go through with that (especially after announcing it publicly).

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Our taxes go to punitive enforcement now. ICE has become massive, gulags being built, our military is massive, now trump is making agencies to spy on and amass data about Americans, etc. but social programs are being cut, scientific programs are being cut, citizens protections cut…

Plenty of money for punishment. None to improve lives.

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

Yeah but the orange manbaby did funny impression of a disabled person, and that speaks to my inner dickhead

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Corporate tax cuts are economic growth, which helps approval ratings.

Deficits are an easy way to please everyone by offloading austerity to the future.

So every government in all of human history has borrowed from the future, and have even curated their economists to push a message that deflation is dangerous and that debt needs to be monetized.

Then for some reason debt has exploded, crypto and risk stocks are completely disconnected from reality, and the bailouts get larger and larger.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That golden droplet ain’t money trickling down.

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This in my view is the main cause of inequality, how could it not be when average people make a static salary while the money supply grows 8% a year?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yup. Pretty much.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As someone who may've taken the extended family on a 20k holiday when crypto boomed pre-panda, I would certainly describe the experience as unreal.

[–] derry@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"may've taken the extended family on a 20k holiday" So Disney for a day?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

On the other hand, austerity politics (aka "don't spend money in order to reduce the national debt") tend not to work, either, because they offload maintenance to the future. Repairing broken infrastructure costs more than keeping it from breaking in the first place.

I suppose you could just raise taxes but even with WWII-level tax ceilings it's damn expensive to run a country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not sure about the title of this post. But I just really wish more Democrat voters would come to the realization that a lot of people didn't vote for Trump because they liked him. They voted for him because of how absolutely ineffective the Democratic party has been.

Zohran should really be a reality check for people. The people that voted for him were not politics Andy's like you and I. They voted for him because he had a clear message "free busses and rent freeze" is his "build the wall".

People are looking for real promises. The biggest difference is that a rent freeze and better public transit actually will improve their lives.

If you don't offer real improvements the masses will go for the guy with the xenophobic policy. A policy that promises to hurt "people not like me" and maybe then that will make my life better.

That's the reasoning. Simple as.

It's not because the masses love racism or rapists. It's because they are so desperate for a politician that will actually represent working class interest that the first idiot billionaire with charisma was a "why not" in 2016.

In 2024 it was a complete lack of the Democratic party to capitalize on that. There are people in America thirsting for the "change" that Obama promised. They just got wise. They realized that if it's called "change" or "abundance" it's the same stupid shit that maintains the interest of the rich.

They want simple promises of actual material improvement that a politician can be judged on. And Zohran will be. But he's brave enough to actually take a stand.

Edit: seriously, please don't fall for the same neoliberalism packaged as "abundance" this time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redlegion@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We shouldn't. We should protest by organizing the largest tax fraud push the country has ever seen. Someone should create a website to coordinate this effort. Maybe it could even grow into a movement where everyone helps each other to not pay any taxes at all.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you claim to be exempt from federal income taxes, you can withhold those on your paycheck. Talk to your HR department. If you switch jobs, when you sign up for everything make sure to explain the situation. As in, I am exempt, as I did not make enough money last year. Do not charge my paycheck for federal taxes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder what sort of impact it would have if everyone who's upset with Trump's lawlessness adjusted their tax withholding at work to not withhold anything. They'd have to save the money so they can pay their taxes next April to avoid legal trouble, but in the meantime, federal income could get hamstrung.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They'd just use it as an excuse to cut more programs.

Hell, according to the CBO, the current bill is guaranteed to cause an imbalance in the budget, which thanks to existing pay go rules means across the board cuts to everything, including Medicare.

This way they didn't purposely or directly fuck over Medicare. It was just an oopsie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a tremendous amount of concerted effort that that plan would take. I don't see it happening.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it'd be a fuckload easier than arranging a general strike. No missed work, no lost income, no need to coordinate a universal date to act on collectively, just a little paperwork and some effort to maintain savings. As more people hear and get upset, the money faucet slowly shuts more and more.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Am I high or is everyone in this thread just ignoring that the IRS can garnish your wages and put levies on your accounts?

Unless everyone triggers a bank run to get their dollars into coffee cans, taking what you owe is as simple as a few key strokes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Did you make it funny: X

Did you just post your opinion in bold font : ●

load more comments (5 replies)

somebody has to pay for ICE being one of the biggest armed forces in the world.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How does the american tax system work?

I remember hearing 10 years ago that it was a hell of a lot of work to figure out how much taxes you had to pay to IRS, and that for filing your taxes, you often needed a lawyer or sth like that.

And then they changed it and implemented sth like "direct tax" or sth, and that means that they take your taxes from you automatically, without your intervention. Is that accurate?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's pretty straightforward for most people if you're filing for yourself. It only gets complicated if you do itemized deductions which only makes sense if your total deductions are greater than the "standard deduction" (which I think is like $12,500 or something? The tax app does it for you).

You decide how much withholding that your job will do when you are hired (you can have it changed if you want). You can choose to have them estimate based on how many dependents you have and deduct that from each paycheck. It will usually be slightly more than you actually owe, so you get a return when you file once a year. Or you can choose to not have them deduct anything, and then pay the IRS the total amount when you file.

The latter is probably the smarter way to do it in that you're not essentially loaning money to the IRS, but in a country where most people live paycheck to paycheck, people don't like the idea of having to write the government a 4 to 5-figure check every year.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 6 points 1 week ago

I'm self employed. My taxes are about six forms that cross-reference each other, a pita for sure. Also I pay a higher tax rate than billionaires.

[–] Legge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

No, not entirely.

We have taxes taken out every paycheck that is kind of like an estimate of what you actually owe. At the end of the year, you file complicated paperwork to determine what you actually owe. Big tax companies lobby hard to keep it this way.

For anything more complicated than a very basic life, people often use a tax company (like TurboTax or HR block) for help, which costs money. For even more complicated ones, people may use an accountant.

It's a ridiculous system and the lobbyists keep it like that

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Its both. Your taxes are deducted from your paycheck then from January to April you have to "file taxes" often with the assistance of a tax service or accountant then either pay extra or wait several weeks to get the amount you paid "too much" into.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To add on to the other explanations: The thing you heard about 10 years ago was likely Trump's tax bill that increased the standard deduction - a set amount that you can deduct instead of having to do a lot of math - and took a way a lot of deductions.

A deduction just means "you don't pay taxes on that money."

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The big deductions that hurt was removing deductions for items people bought for work. The idea is that the employer should be providing that stuff, but that's not always realistic.

Without a doctor's note, lots of businesses aren't going to buy an employee an ergonomic chair because it costs 10 times as much as the Amazon special. They also aren't going to buy you a wardrobe of business suits that you'll only use for meetings. Being able to write that stuff off was huge for some of us.

I had to convince my side gig (teaching scuba and underwater photography) to change me from employee to contractor because I suddenly couldn't write off my gear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Food for thought: private income tax was levied in the US to bolster the Civil War effort against these fuckstains' ancestors (and, largely met with resistance, at the time), but then quietly forgotten to be removed again. IIRC, it was most recently given legal precedence when corporations became people. 🤔

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

They're going to put you in jail anyway. May as well stop providing them with the money to do it.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They don't really care to have a reason any more.

[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The threat of violence against our person and family, that's why.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Cool. Hiw about a national tax exempt status followed by a general strike. Starve them out.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The will just lock you up if you don't. Corporations have to be ok with saying "no".

Not gonna happen.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That isn't how taxes work in the usa. The government borrows money from your/our future prints it to pay all its bills. Taxes just cover a bit of the expenditures when they come in. The government can care less about balancing the budget. So it doesn't matter if they get their money throughout the year or in April you wont hurt them. Only thing at risk is general people being audited and hurt also i believe you pay a penalty for not paying through the year. Since I have been alive we never have had a surplus. It would take years of a democratic presidency for the surplus to hit as the programs take years to produce profits and reduce the deficit. Sadly a democratic president/platform never stays popular for long enough.

load more comments
view more: next ›