this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
681 points (95.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

12287 readers
2653 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DegenerateSupreme@lemmy.zip 60 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The shift to these ridiculously large trucks is partially consequent of the poorly-implemented Obama fuel economy regulations. The regulations were determined by wheelbase and tread width, which disincentivized manufacturers from making mid- or small-sized trucks. The bigger they made them, the less restricted they were by fuel economy. Larger vehicles also ease constraints on engineers; they don't have to struggle fitting a lot into a small body. Once large trucks became the default offering, they morphed into the annoying cultural "status" symbol we know today.

Anyway I have a Miata MX-5 and I love my tiny car.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The CAFE act caused most of these changes and was signed by Clinton in the early '90s. Obama may have made things worse, but the roots of the problem go back much further

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

CAFE standards date to 1975

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Ahh, didn't realize that. I guess Clinton expanded them?

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

I also love your tiny car, even when I see one from behind the wheel of my slightly less tiny Civic, which I adore.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

Long before that though, back when SUVs became popular because they were trucks and didn't have to obey sedan fuel economy. This was back in the late 90s

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

🎵 12 yards long, 2 lanes wide 🎵

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

65 tonnes of American pride!

[–] mothersprotege@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Top of the line in utility sports

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 17 points 6 days ago

Baby, I may have micropenis, but my monster truck will vibrate enough to make you orgasm!!!
Some time later, the woman breaks up with the dude and starts a relationship with the truck

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

Here in Alberta, young men hatch out of their eggs with a mullet on their head and the keys to a Ram in their hand. It's basically a social pressure at this point.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 14 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I was in Rome last week and pleasantly surprised to see how many tiny cars they use.

There were plenty of Smart cars, but also many other ultra minis like Citroën AMI, XEV Yo-Yo and Renault Twizy.

They're not just concept cars or used as gimmicks like elsewhere. People actually use them for their daily business.

The traffic in Rome is insane though. The reason they use tiny cars isn't that the roads are small, but due to congestion and parking. It makes very little sense to own a car there at all.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago

It makes sense for Rome though, these cars are expensive and appeal to the fashion sensibilities of the population there, rather than just using the good public transport there. It's a signal of wealth, rather than an actual functional commodity.

I found this out the hard way the last time I expressed my love of the AMI

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Yep my uncle's work van in the UK was as small as my Honda Fit. Just two barebones front seats and an empty cargo space.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago

i live in malta and got an xev yoyo amonths ago today. It's my daily driver.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean why would that not be so? I no longer own a car but when I did, it was usually oversized for what I needed to transport (me and my backpack).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Thanks Obama

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But I need my insanely large blacked out, lifted, with black rims, f-250. I have to get 3 bags of groceries.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Of course off-road capabilities are required. How else would I drive on nicely paved suburban roads?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Just always gotta be prepared for the one day a year snow stays on the ground. Even in June.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Guess what destroys offroad performance though?

An insanely long wheelbase coupled with a top heavy design....

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Well, it's marketed to the same people who think that a Cybertruck is an offroad vehicle.

load more comments
view more: next ›