this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
1118 points (96.6% liked)

People Twitter

7431 readers
2221 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These soldiers spend their days doing important work to defend our nation.

The U.S. military has done nothing to defend their "nation" for over 100 years. They ONLY defend the corporate oligarchs' ability to steal resources and use slave labor in third world countries.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (27 children)

Lmao yet Ukraine still stands thanks to American intelligence and military apparatus.

I'm not even an American but this kindergarten sentiment on Lemmy is so exhausting.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago

And then promptly fucked right out of peace negotiations immediately after signing the resources deal. Fits perfectly well with

They ONLY defend the corporate oligarchs’ ability to steal resources and use slave labor in third world countries.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah you get a lot of these 'moral purity absolutists' with all the nuance of an edgy teen. Some of them, or course, are edgy teens, but 100 years is a super odd choice even so. You'd think by the time they were 13 they'd have heard of at least one war that came pretty close to defense against a malign hegemonic power with ambitions of global domination....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago (15 children)

Yeah! They need to do important stuff!

Like point guns at me while I'm going to the grocery store!

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 32 points 4 days ago (16 children)

They can dEfEnD oUr NaTiOn against brown peasants, but can't march in step because they apparent forget how to do so after basic training? Shit, it's been over 20 years since my military service and I'm 100% sure I could still manage to march in step

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I just think it's odd that they're not wearing class A's or even B's

When I was in 20+ years ago they didn't even want us stopping for gas off-post in our BDU's on the way home from work

Wearing white parade gloves in that uniform also just looks weird

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I think it was probably in protest. However they can, I guess.

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 27 points 4 days ago (3 children)

So, the tweet isn't entirely true; my experience in the army was that we very much did irregularly do marches together, even after basic training. Every few months or so the battallion or brigade leadership would get an idea about a 'fun run' or whatever, and the start of those is always a march together. It inevitably switched to running together, but there was definitely a quick refresher on walking in step together on a regular basis.

What the tweeter missed is that there's tricks that every leadership command knows to do if they want a formation to look good.

If you wanted to put a military parade on that actually looked good you'd do a couple things prior to running it. You'd tell your various units to have a competition for who does it best, and you'd put up a basic-ass award for the winners and runners up. This ensures that any ladder climbers go out and find all the people who are actually good at this to put together a small super squad of people who actually know what they're doing. You then have them compete, and you pick the units that did the best to lead your parade.

We actually did this in basic training; my drill sgts had a little demonstration where they put the people good at keeping time together and the people bad it together. It was damn impressive how much of a difference just doing that made. One or two bad marchers can ruin a whole formation with their lack of timing.

None of this was done; at best they practiced for pt for a couple weeks before the event, but even that is iffy. They likely didn't bother to filter the parade members who can't march out, and that'd be good enough to turn this into a herd instead of a formation.

This doesn't rule out malicious compliance at all though; again, one or two bad marchees doing their best (or worst) job can completely throw off the timing of everybody behind and next to them. Same way as counting wrongly out loud can throw off someone trying to count up to 50.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 24 points 4 days ago

My volunteer fire department was able to march in sync in parades despite having enjoyed a few adult beverages beforehand. What the Army did had to be deliberate.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›