this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

Firefox

17768 readers
18 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm choosing a main browser, and I think that firefox with ublock and brave are probably equally good in terms of privacy and security, both of them look quite nice, and both are FOSS. The final thing that I'm considering is resource consumption. This reddit post shows that firefox is better than brave in benchmarks and ram consumption, but what about when firefox has ublock running and brave has all their preinstalled "extension" like brave rewards and wallet disabled (except brave shields is left enabled)?

Edit: some people are mentioning brave's cryptocurrency. I don't want to use that, and I would just turn it off and use brave as an improved chrome.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jarmer@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please don’t use Brave. It’s got a bunch of crypto bullshit built into it, has a terrible track record of doing scummy shit, and to top it all off is based on chromium anyway.

Just use Firefox!

[–] first_ad4972@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t want to use the crypto, if I just turn it off and use brave as an improved chrome, then which one is better?

[–] Jarmer@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brave still doesn’t have your best interests in mind. They’re a for profit company. They’ll eventually drop the crypto garbage because it’s worthless anyway, but rest assured they’ll attempt some other way to wrangle money out of you and it probably won’t be good.

Again: just use Firefox! It’s the opposite of all of that.

[–] nitefox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reminder that stock firefox is less privacy-oriented than Brave and they use Google as the default search engine

[–] first_ad4972@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I know that. In the title I said that I’m comparing brave to Firefox with ublock

[–] Sleepkever@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are probably better off switching back to Edge, Opera GX, Chromium or even Chrome instead of Brave if you still want to use a chrome based browser. They have made some questionable decisions in the past.

BAT cryptotokens

So brave rewards you with their own injected advertisements with crypto, probably their most discussed feature. Could be a good idea if implemented correctly. But the real issue here is that they block advertisements and then add their own "privacy minded" advertisements back into the page for which you and they earn some crypto. So not only do you still see some ads with the default settings, now the site/content creators get nothing and brave earns money of your page views.

Creator donations

Speaking of content creators: At some point brave also had donation links on Youtube for those content creators that now earn less trough blocked advertisements and make brave money. Showing these donation links for specific creators, with their name and photo attached, with no opt-in or consent from creators themselves. Tom Scott even asked if they could refund everyone that donated to which they replied "Refunds are impossible". It looks like they changed the way that works after feedback though so no funds are being donated anymore unless the creator verifies in brave.

Affiliate links

At some point brave changed URL's from binance, even when typed in manually, directly to their affiliate link. They even publicly apologized after that. Which shows they are willing to change URL's to earn some money off you.

So yeah you could probably still use Brave even if you disable the crypto aspect but from actions in the past they have shown they really want to earn money off you. And they haven't hesitated to explore boundaries of what people find acceptable to get that money in the past. I personally wouldn't trust them to not do something questionable in the future either, crypto or no crypto.

[–] first_ad4972@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what if I don’t log in when I use brave? Then it would have no way to get money from me.

[–] Sleepkever@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

You think they can't earn money from users that are not logged in? Sweet summer child.

They will still show ads on the search page. The dirty affiliate redirects they will think off will still work in their browser. You are effectivly using a software platform they have total control over. Offcourse they are going to find ways to earn money.

It's like saying Facebook can't track me because I'm not logged in. Or Google Ads don't earn money from me because I'm not logged in.

[–] mercan@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

A comment I was waiting for. “Brave is crypto scam, period”. OP you won’t get an objective insight from Firefox community.

[–] Gargari@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Use Firefox. Brave is Chromium. Brave's crypocurrency stuff is shady, I need a browser not a crypto. uBlock (arguably the best extension) properly only works on Firefox. There is LibreWolf (Firefox mod) if you want ready to use, hardened browser.

[–] first_ad4972@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t want to use the crypto, if I just turn it off and use brave as an improved chrome, then which one is better?

uBlock (arguably the best extension) properly only works on Firefox

Isn't brave's adblocker just ublock?

[–] Gargari@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Still no, try ungoogled chromium. Unlock is much more than adblocker, their page describes it better

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

With how ripe the Chromium Monopoly is for abuse, I would strongly consider using Firefox. Or even better, Librewolf.

[–] catboy@mstdn.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@first_ad4972 as far as i know, firefox consumes less ressources than Chromium. But don't know if Brave changed some stuff to make it more efficient.

uBlock shouldn't affect firefox very negatively. As far as I know, even more positively. Because there is less content to load.

Edit: look at the screenshot. That's from uBlocks Website.

Edit 2: Lemmy doesn't display my Image. It sais uBlock lets Firefox consume even less ressources.

[–] 0oWow@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Too many people here seem to be too focused on cryptocurrency and ignore the data mining that Firefox does, even when you turn off telemetry collection in Firefox settings.

I'm not saying Firefox is bad, but cryptocurrency issues of brave don't compare to the data mining of Firefox. Use what you prefer, as either are very good browsers when setup right.

[–] Sleepkever@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

That sounds interesting. Do you have anything going in depth about what data is being collected by Firefox? I haven't heard about that before now.

[–] vintprox@geddit.social 4 points 1 year ago

I like it with sauce, pretty please.

[–] mercan@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I know Brave has a feature to turn off inactive tabs to reduce memory consumption. Don’t think Firefox does

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mercan@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago

Yep. Strangely there's a discussion about it on Reddit from a few days before the blackout

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not sure if it's an official feature somewhere but I use Auto Tab Discard and it works very well. It also has whitelisting supporting for when you want specific websites to never be discarded.

[–] wreckage@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Not sure if it’s an official feature somewhere

I'm not sure either, but after reading the add-on description, it seems like it might be.

Unlike the "The Great Suspender" extension, this extension uses the native method for discarding tabs, which means that even if the extension is removed or the browser crashes, your browser will automatically restore everything for you.

It appears to me that the add-on simply allows for more control over which tabs are automatically or manually discarded, and it also indicates if a tab was discarded or not

[–] mercan@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing is Brave doesn’t discard tabs, just set them to some “sleep” mode afaik

[–] wreckage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The add-on's name is misleading. The add-on does the same thing as brave