this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
1082 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

72740 readers
1810 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Angular2575@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

No thanks, demolish Leon Hitler's space program and bury it. NASA should be the US leader for space missions and not a South African neo-Nazi sack of shit.

[–] Campliving69@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Agreed. These are things that should be of the people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

One way to get businesses to move their factories back to the US due to tarrifs: Start nationalizing them.

/s

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (39 children)

The precedent that will set and the implications... No... We should not do this.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Nationalization is the opposite of privatization, it's how the US's bureaucratic state was really built, we should absolutely do this and right now is the time

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't nationalize anything long as the orange could possibly profit off it

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

imagine how many more rockets we could reuse if the NASA subdivision formerly known as SpaceX did literally any of the standard, rigorous fault-checks.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

If we do, we'll definitely reach mars. I can imagine it now! Its 3055 and everything is totally fine now that we can escape to Mars in an inflatable city. A whole 4000 square feet of freedom soaring thru the sky with the last of us aboard ready for a whole new life and a good 7 in inflated cities for our children to live. She changes her name to Mother Gaia and His name is now Adam. One day in the distant future perhaps a large meteor would come roaring and reshaping our planet into livable space again.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

NOW they complain about giving Musk money?
Most of the 38 billion was given by Biden.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Hang on a minute, equivalents of SpaceX and Starlink could have naturally grown out of NASA, it was the obvious place for them to come from but NASA did not show that innovation and nationalisation of them might dilute their abilities. For clarity I am not suggesting the innovation came from Musk, he has no science or engineering, his talents are grifting, showmanship and taking credit for other people's work, he is a natural figurehead though and seemed quite clear thinking until he lost his mind.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›