this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
591 points (98.7% liked)

Reddit

20738 readers
116 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 24 points 1 week ago

Nawww is the little piggy boy scared we're gonna come for him?

Good.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Insane strategy, Silicon Valley execs. Sell the thing that you believe is gonna cause the apocalypse so you can afford to have apocalypse insurance. That definitely needed to happen...

[–] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This is it.. how about these dudes stopped preparing for the apocalypse that they themselves are causing, and instead changed the reality they've created, thus preventing said apocalypse from taking place in the first place..

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That would require empowering the poors and they can’t be having that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All these billionaires stockpiling in their secure bunkers have clearly never heard of the word 'siege'.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

seige only works if the besieged don't have enough supplies and food production.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well, if you can find the bunker and have nothing but time on your hands, you can get through concrete.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You don't even need power tools if you have enough time. Spent about £500 on disposing of all the concrete my garden was paved with, the only tools being a sledgehammer and crowbar. And like 10 pairs of gloves.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That may have been true before explosives technology was developed

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

There is a reason the trebuchet was invented.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

It's almost like we should strike now before they have a chance to run and hide.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI isn’t the problem. AI in a capitalist system is the problem. People don’t need to do jobs that aren’t necessary any more to survive unless you are in a capitalist system that puts profit over society. People need to be taken care of regardless of their “value” to the capitalist machine. Communism focuses on allocating resources to all people because people deserve to be taken care of as part of a functioning society. If we didn’t live in a harsh capitalist system of exploitation of labor, AI would be seen as a way to further enhance society and would be developed responsibly.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AI isn't the problem. Greedy, power-hungry people are. Tale as old as time (the saying will be even more true after AI solves time travel).

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Capitalism encourages and rewards greed. Societies needs to organize around elevation of the overall quality of life, not around a system that rewards our worst impulses.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How's this prick planning to reach the bunker in case of societal collapse/apocalypse?

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm sure he'll find unpaid volunteers to carry his ass, that he'll sell out once they reach the bunker.

/s

[–] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

Good to know. I will put it on the map of rich people to rob when life becomes a Mad Max movie.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Aaron Swartz is spinning in his grave

Edit: Misspelled his last name

[–] DABDA@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BuckRowdy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

For real though... Why are so many people freaking the fuck out over AI? Sure. A robot can replace a forklift driver or a cashier. But there are an insane amount of jobs still that robots or ai can't replace for decades upon decades yet. But people believe that chatgpt will somehow create megabot blue collar workers within the next few weeks

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because whether or not AI can actually do a certain job is irrelevant when the c-suite thinks it can.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 week ago

I've become convinced that the c-suite doesn't even care of they think AI can do a job. If they can convince investors and/or the board that they should dump money into it and their golden parachute, that's good enough.

Now, if only there was a term for intentionally misleading people investing in your leadership into thinking something is much more capable than it really is and running with the cash...

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're underestimating:

  1. The speed of progress of the current generation of AI
  2. The number of jobs that AI can already replace.
  3. Just how many fuckin' people are forklift drivers or cashiers
  4. The will of your employers to be rid of annoying, needy employees

You're overestimating:

  1. The actual productivity of most people
  2. Your actual worth to your company
  3. How much company leaders understand about AI outside of "I can cut headcount by a lot"

I think the part that most people miss is that it's not about being a 1:1 replacement. With proper use of the AI tools we have now, it's not at all unexpected for one person to be able to do the job of many by overseeing the running and output of AI agents. AI isn't going to replace whole industries (yet), but it is absolutely going to replace half of the members of a lot of teams.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think the thing I haven't quite sussed out is... Well, let's take Wal-Mart and Dollar General. Wal-mart and DG both have this weird niche of being both major employers for rural areas, as well as depending on nearly their employee base as customers. If they automate all their jobs away, who do they think they're going to be selling to? My guess so far is that all these MBAs think that certainly their customer base won't run out of cash by having their jobs automated away.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Seems to be the case for a lot of industries, even if not as blatant. The economy thrives when people have the means to buy products. You can make production as cheap as you want, you're not making much profit if only the 1% can buy them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Is your vision for the rest of us merely a few weeks ?

Or can you see past June 2025 at all from where you sit ?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

But what do those forklift drivers and cashiers do?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›