this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
1941 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

7673 readers
2607 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 347 points 1 day ago (9 children)

SOMETIMES A CHECKMATE IS JUST SO FUCKING POETIC.

Butters: weiners out!

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 128 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For real, this is such a great move. Oh sure, the government could just ban nipples in general, but good luck enforcing that when it gets mildly warm and every scottish man rips their shirt off

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

is that the "red wave" they've been warning us about?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 64 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (12 children)

In America most men are overweight or obese and have pendulous lumps on their chests with nipples attached. Personally I don't love seeing them, but when the weather is right, they are all over the goddamn place. It's absolutely ludicrous that women can't do the same. If there were any logical rule it would be don't show your chesticles unless you are a woman who uses them for feeding a child OR everybody gets to have their tits out regardless of any gender types. Pick one and go with it, but the current laws are base AF.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 31 points 23 hours ago

Austin actually has a city ordinance with more or less this exact logic. Once you’ve seen a dozen or so average women with their chests uncovered at the pool, it loses any excitement it may have initially held.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Here in Fort Collins, it’s tits out for all. Come all and welcome for those that would like their tits out.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Isn't it technically legal there for women to be topless, too?

Edit: a bit dated, but it seems that they can go topless only in a few state.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 181 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Another example of the Scots fighting for freedom .... they've been doing it successfully for thousands of years and they're still doing it!

I will never in my life ever understand the fight against gay, lesbian, bi, queer, LGBTQ+

They are a fraction of the population yet the majority causes them immeasurable harm simply because they exist. The louder they persecute, the more prominent LGBTQ+ movement becomes .... it's contradictory. If conservatives had just left them alone, there would almost be no issue about any of this at all.

There are far more important debates and fights to be had in our society .... namely the fight to preserve the survivability of our species in the coming centuries ... yet here we are fighting about who gets to show or not show their tits!!!!

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I will never in my life ever understand the fight against gay, lesbian, bi, queer, LGBTQ+

One argument is that any (fictional) male can just put on a wig and a dress and enter any "women designated" area.

The people making this argument are usually men and rarely has an actual incident occurred.

(This opinion is based on trying to give Graham Linehan a benefit of doubt)

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Conservatives need a demographic to hate. This one is perfect because they will never be Conservatives, and most hardcore Conservatives can't stand to see homosexual PDA.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they will never be Conservatives

I wish that were true, but I have family that is deeply conservative and so is her wife.

Same. I used to work with a lesbian who was a born-again Christian who thinks gay people shouldn't kiss or hold hands in public becuase it could indoctrinate children (she literally used the word indoctrinate when talking about this with me). They do exist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's nothing to understand. It's about hate and fear. Conservatives, specifically the alt-right, uses pre-existing prejudices to whip fear into their followers so that they get distracted.

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

You can change this to whatever out-group they have chosen:

  • Trans-people
  • autistic people specifically
  • LGBT people
  • neurodivergent people
  • gay people specifically
  • muslims
  • non-white people
  • black people specifically
  • Catholics (if you're protestant)
  • Protestant (if your Catholic)
  • left handed people

The list literally goes on. All so that their followers get distracted from the people who are picking their pockets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shads@lemy.lol 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When gay marriage was being debated here in Australia my sister (who is gay) was super upset the whole time. She talked about how much the fight affected her and wished that people who were against would just understand.

I told her I was a complete supporter of gay marriage for a whole bunch of reasons including:

  • human decency
  • equality
  • people who don't like gay marriage can just... Not get married to another person of the same gender.
  • people should just mind their own fucking business

However I did also point out that a lot of the loudest voices against gay marriage literally did not give a flying fuck about the issue, it was a convenient wedge and distraction for them, the people who need a group to vilify for political reasons would have to find another target for persecution as soon as they lost this particular convenient red rag to a bull.

Today in Australia, I believe, the usual suspects who use fear and hatred as the bedrock of their politics have been able to tap into a deeper vein of ignorance to make Trans people that target.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 129 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Tits censored, guess they are women then. Fuck the transphobes

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

actually proud of Scotland for once, not the government but the people

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 56 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

It's the UK supreme court, not a Scottish court, that decided to stomp over all the progress we had made with trans rights.

The Scottish Parliament tends to be considerably more left wing than the UK Parliament. Left to their own devices they would probably be much more like a Scandinavian country.

But actually, yes, the Scottish people are indeed awesome.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 16 hours ago

I was particularly amused the time they decided to beat up a terrorist.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah the government was kind of referring to the UK government there, they seem to ruin everything

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 14 points 21 hours ago

The Scottish and Irish have been saying that for hundreds of years

[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Love the message, but the blurb isn't correct. Police couldn't not arrest them because it would define them as a woman, outraging public decency and similar laws don't require specific genders.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had a look further into this, because I wanted to better understand what factors might cause an act to be considered indecent exposure (or outraging public decency). This led me to some guidance on naturism and other non-sexual nudity, from the crown prosecution service.^1 It appears that having an "intention to cause alarm or distress" may be relevant for protests like this — arguably the entire point of the protest is to use the shock value of the nudity as a protest.

That being said, I think it's a bold move and possibly an effective protest. Even if public indecency laws are gender neutral, it would still be a strong message if any of these women got arrested for this — the reason why these women are capable of causing alarm or distress by going topless is because these are "female presenting nipples" (to use a heavily-memed phrase from the Tumblr porn ban era)


load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

The police in Edinburgh aren't going to do anything. People get their tits 'n' bits out regularly "for art/paganism"

https://beltane.org/about-beltane/

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 97 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Biological women can do it too if they print and cut out pics of men nipples and stick them on top.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] adj16@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Omg I hate it so much, thank you

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

Hmm...

spoiler


Pretty sure it's just a bug in the federation of images between blahaj.zone and lemmy.world, but it was a funny coincidence.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago

This is fucking rad.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›