this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
151 points (85.1% liked)

Privacy

37753 readers
741 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I remember a time when visiting a website that opens a javacript dialog box asking for your name so the message "hi " could be displayed was baulked at.

Why does signal want a phone number to register? Is there a better alternative?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 33 points 1 day ago (25 children)

Bots. If it makes you feel better, you can disable other people finding you via phone number and just give them your username. All messages are private.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 day ago

Everything is a balancing act. Privacy, anonymity, and security aren't the same things. They're sometimes, and in some aspects always, difficult to achieve without compromising one of the other two.

When you add in the goal of quick, easy setup to make the service useful in the first place. Doesn't matter how good the service is at the trinity if nobody is willing to use it. Signal just errs on security first, privacy second, anonymity third.

[–] XenGi@feddit.org 32 points 1 day ago (14 children)

One of the design goals is that they don't have a user database, so governments etc can't knock down their door demanding anything. By using phone numbers your "contacts" are not on their servers but local on your phone.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (7 children)

Signal is not perfect but we control its app, libre software. See SimpleX Chat.

Escaping WhatsApp and Discord, anti-libre software, is more important.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] moreeni@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's focused on ensuring there is no middleman between you and the other party, but it does not have a goal to provide anonymous messaging. Sadly.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

SimpleX is coming nicely along. Should be good to switch next year once they got their desktop apps polished up

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Simplex has a bad user experience and needs a lot of work before it's ready for normies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›