this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
891 points (93.6% liked)

Political Memes

8001 readers
3008 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 29 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I have never met a "centrist" on social media who wasn't. Same with the horseshoe theory.

Let's take America: are you for democracy or against it? - "I can see both sides" - wtf? Fascist enabler, at best.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (34 children)

I prefer stethoscope theory.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Even if they're not a right-winger and don't claim to be a centrist, "both-sides"ing things is a waste of time, at best.

Like, when Jon Stewart came back to the Daily Show. I think it was his first show back, but it might have been his second... And his main talking point was about how both Biden and Trump were old. I know he's just a comedian on a comedy show, but it still felt like a betrayal. At the very best, it was a waste of a chance to say something that could have actually made a difference.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I mean, they are both old, I don't think that's a perspective that should be discounted. That's not a discussion on policy or who one should vote for as much as it is the understandable concern about whether either of them would still be alive for their entire second term.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I like Jon, but TDS has done more harm than good for the left.

  1. It just normalized the Republican CRIMINAL behaviour by making fun of it and laughing, like it was no big deal

  2. It made an entire generation complacent becuase people though watching TDS and jucking along was actually doing fuck all to actually fight Republicans or help Democrats.

  3. And finally, like you said they'd frequently have both sides segments that the right loved to echo on their propaganda networks

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's also:

"Leftist" insisting on "both sides".

-mask pull-

Russian bot

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Russian bot

So a right-wing fascist supporter.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nuance is inconvenient to radicals and fundamentalists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, well.....when you've been indoctrinated by the internet the majority of your adult life, you (totally unironically /s) view anyone that doesn't align exactly with your world view as a Totalitarian.

I would say it's a problem, but at least it keeps you all in a centralized bubble that allows you to believe "we are the majority!!", without actually impacting the real world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] farcaster@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

On the other hand, the kneejerk of labeling every even remotely centrist viewpoint as inherently dishonest is pretty annoying. My own views lean SocDem and I've found voicing any opinion which is neither solidly left-wing or solidly right-wing, especially if it does not align with very American-centric views of the political spectrum, often elicits unpleasant reactions. Nuance is hard, I guess.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

As an anarchist. The seething hate I've received for pointing out. That the genocide in Palestine is truly an appropriate both sides thing. That it wasn't just Biden or just Harris. That it was our senators, our Congress people, and the executive branch.

That it was going to be a Republican or a Democrat that won the presidential election. And we all would definitely prefer it wasn't for the Republican. Or that if Fox News covers you without wildly editorializing or smearing you. You done fucked up. You could be forgiven for thinking I had just strangled their grandmother's from the reaction.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. I also think that both sides extremes are absolutely awful.

The difference is that us "real" "both-siders" realize and agree that the fascist side is much more imminent and dangerous and therefore tend to ally with the left.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The difference is that us "real" "both-siders" realize and agree that the fascist side is much more imminent and dangerous and therefore tend to ally with the left.

Say more about this. Some news articles. Some journalists. Some academic papers. Something to validate your statement here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›