this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
721 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

70057 readers
3876 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Now I understand why at each windows 11 update, they introduce more bugs than ever

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

“Written by software” does not inherently mean AI.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that 20% to 30% of code inside the company’s repositories was “written by software” — meaning AI.

Nadella gave the figure after Zuckerberg asked roughly how much of Microsoft’s code is AI generated today.

I highlighted part of the article for you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If they start with those products today with zero marketing budged and zero user base nobody would use it. Those CEOs are just clowns.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Even worse, whenever a good new technology does pop up they buy it and ruin it.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

We can tell

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Windows is 95 percent pure bloat now imo, an os just needs to handle my hardware and launch my programs anything else is just eating my resources.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

50% of my code is written by Intellisense...

[–] superkret@feddit.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, I'm not surprised.

[–] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

Well that explains a lot

[–] Zink@programming.dev 9 points 2 weeks ago

Eww. Maybe it’s not really true and Microsoft just wants to remind us that big corporate AI is so legit that all the software you use all day was “helped” by it.

But really for me the issue is the company, not the AI. If I read an article about AI generated code making it into the Linux kernel or some gnu/kde/etc utilities, I don’t think I would worry much because those changes will be reviewed by cranky old nerds who care about the functionality of the software first. I have no such confidence in Microsoft’s processes.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

??? No it’s not! Can investors sue because this is such an obvious lie? Pls I have 0.3 Microsoft shares

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're attempting to make excuses for their inability to create functional software

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Satya Nadella has given an evasive answer there and both Zuckerberg and the journalists have been taken in.

It is common in programming languages that have a lot of boilerplate to use code generation, where you take some information about data and generate code automatically, like code that translates data between formats (for example reading and writing xml for saving to disk or json to send over the network). Being very routine to write and easy to deduce logically from other information, this process has been automated for years and years, long before AI existed.

Microsoft's flagship software such as operating systems, office software, is unbelievably vast and complex, far beyond the complexity of most business software, and has been developed over decades. They absolutely have not replaced 30% of their code since the very recent advent of useful AI. I can believe that 30% of it is automatically generated, but not by AI.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

If you count all of my contributions, 0%.

None of my contributions have been included. I am a terrible programmer.

[–] sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Not suprised

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Copilot. Piloting you towards effortless bugs, and with all the telemetry, we don’t need to test our patches and updates. You, the user are doing that for us. Sincerely, Microsoft.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fun fact: Nadella has been replaced with an AI agent a couple of months ago and nobody has noticed yet. "Copilot, while I'm away, generate bs on AI adoption and fire a bunch of employees, ok?"

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If this were true there would massive databreaches. AI is really bad at keeping private keys private. Not to even mention the default credentials it would use because it doesnt have commen sense to change them

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Wonder how much of Windows 10 was written by Stack Exchange?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Year of the Linux desktop

(Amusing sidenote: my autocomplete's first suggestion after 'Linux' was 'propaganda'.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›