this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
677 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

69772 readers
4703 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phantomwise@lemmy.ml 34 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Let's also replace the customers by AI, that way the whole system will really be "AI first" and self-sufficient.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

it's a matter of time (or more likely has already happen) where an AI company ends up having only AI users, it makes money be selling adds to show to the users, which are all AI bots, and then selling those bots as user data.

then said company celebrates that it has no humans involved making a shit ton of profit.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

So Twitter?

[–] Hyphlosion@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

Afraid to find out what an AI Karen would be like.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

if the labor cost goes down, the service should become cheaper.

if it worked like that, i'd love to have AI replace humans.

AI isn't the problem. capitalism is.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The AI slop is why I quit Duolingo after my 1500+ day streak.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is there an alternative? I just started using it but the experience is incredibly grating, especially the way they gate your progress behind "lives" that stop you learning unless you can pay.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yarr, thar be an alternative. Though some might'n be thinking acquiring such booty be illegal.

[–] Nightsoul@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If you looking to replace dualingo, check with your local library, they may offer free access to different language learning apps. I was able to get Rosetta Stone for free using my library. And they also have access to Muzzy and Transparent language.

[–] Roundeyegweilo@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My son is going to be sad that we don't use duo anymore

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

your local public library (if in US) should offer free language courses online - all you need is a library card

[–] maki@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Maybe time to boycott the service (which anyway was not that spectacular)

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So is there any Duolingo alternative that teaches Esperanto and Indonesian?

[–] crowbar@kbin.earth 1 points 4 days ago

is indonesian that difficult? it has no tenses

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

Esperanto you can learn on lernu.net

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 195 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Duolingo is a tragedy. They really quickly realized that you don’t make money teaching things - you make it on retention and gamification.

Mango languages is great if your library has a subscription. I believe the US’s foreign service materials are also really good, if you want effective but boring.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 122 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I was so upset last year when they got rid of the comment section. There were often helpful explanations for WHY you conjugate the word that way, or how native speakers might use a different word.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 94 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yeah, the comment section was amazing...and then they came out with "max", where you get "explain my answer" for a premium, powered by a [notoriously fallible] LLM. This is the definition of enshitification.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 week ago (5 children)

One of the languages I am learning is an endangered native language, and it was super helpful to see knowledgeable people in the comments.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 148 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Duolingo has enshittified so much over the last few years.

Even if I had the ability to become a millionaire tech founder, I don't think I'd want to because every "I want to make learning new languages free and easy for everyone" becomes a "I have to drive 3% more ad revenue this quarter by charting my users' every bowel movement".

I suspect the reality of being a rich tech bro is watching your adult self slowly consume your own childhood dreams, aspirations, and soul.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 76 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Enshittification is not driven by the founders (mostly, fuck Zuckerberg). It's driven by greedy investors who want their billion dollar unicorn payout and who who will risk a hundred company failures to get it.

A lot of tech companies that manage to resist outside investors are doing just fine.

[–] strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

I mean, true, but maybe the founders shouldn't take investment in the first place?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I canceled Super and uninstalled when they started telling me to get Max. My friends canceled and uninstalled today because of this news.

We might be a small minority but I do giggle at the thought that Duolingo is gonna have to build AI customers soon because nobody will want to use it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 96 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I have found Duolingo much, much less useful for language learning than Language Transfer. The latter actually helps you learn to think in another language rather than memorize things (which is still useful, but not nearly as much).

Short if total immersion, I have found nothing better than LT.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 93 points 1 week ago

If you decide to cancel your subscription and delete your account, they give a warning when deleting that says you need to cancel your subscription SEPARATELY. Just a heads up for anyone thinking of leaving like I did.

[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Apparently they've already been incorporating it and it's very inaccurate. I've decided to stop using them and have switched to LingoDeer and MemRise. Really pleased with how much better they are.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

“Duolingo will remain a company that cares deeply about its employees”

Except for the contract employees. Fuck those people.

In 2012, we bet on mobile. [...] That decision helped us win the 2013 iPhone App of the Year and unlocked the organic word-of-mouth growth that followed. Betting on mobile made all the difference. We’re making a similar call now, and this time the platform shift is AI.

I think this is some sort of fallacy, not sure which tho. Maybe a hasty generalization? "We bet on mobile twelve years ago and won, so if we bet on AI now we'll also win."

*It also seems they're using AI to code... those poor programmers will have to double check every single line it shits out because you know, it's a fucking AI. Yet another company succumbs to a CEOs emotional FOMO.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's okay. We can all play that game. I've replaced my use of Duolingo with AI.

Pro tip: have as your "system prompt" in your LLM of choice "at the end of every query, include me a short Swedish relates to my prompt". No need for Duolingo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brumefey@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 week ago

Duolingo uninstalled

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (5 children)

So if they're using a ChatGPT wrapper to teach me languages, why do I need Duolingo? Copilot is free.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This kind of thing is what confuses me as a business model. Take audio books for example, Audible is pivoting to ai voices. Why would people spend $20 on an audio book with an ai voice when they can just spend $1.99 on the eBook and run it through an ai voice program themselves?

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Because idle that takes off and becomes a threat to their business model, they will just lobby to make such a thing illegal.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

most people have absolutely no idea how to 'run it through an ai voice program' ..... yet

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

True enough. I suspect that "yet" will come pretty soon though. I'm hoping all of these 'early AI adopter' companies fuck themselves out of business. With the tech as it is, most companies pivoting their products to AI on the user-end are just introducing a middle man. Once people catch on to it and realize they can just cut out the middle man, they hopefully won't last long.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

uninstalls Duolingo

leaves 1-star app review

load more comments
view more: next ›