this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
959 points (99.0% liked)

News

29203 readers
3406 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 307 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Yes, keep making enemies of the billionaires that got this administration into office and spent millions of dollars to do so. I'd very much love that for you.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 128 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good thing this isn't a country that came about because a bunch of rich white dudes got tired of being taxed and started a revolution.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (9 children)

That's possibly reframing "no taxation without representation" a bit but I don't entirely disagree with the sentiment.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

How are billionaires being taxed unfairly, and without "Representation," when they own our politicians?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] figjam@midwest.social 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

didn't washington own like the western 2/3 of Pennsylvania?

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And Ohio. He was by far the wealthiest man in the Colonies during his lifetime.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

So, he could have paid other guys to fight the war and stayed home? Instead of being in the middle of the battles, and going cold and hungry in Valley Forge?

There's a lot of bad things you can say about Washington but enough good to at least make him complicated. He chose to limit his own Presidency, the opposite of our wannabe Führer. for one.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They thought funding Trump would get them representation. They were wrong. Trump cares about no one but himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The billionaires have thus far been too cheap to amass private armies to directly enforce their own will. Why, when you can lobby Congress for the price of a used Hyundai Sonata to get the Army to do what you want?

The government holds the power of violence and Trump holds the power of the government. The billionaires will be reminded of that if they get out of line. Coincidentally, this is the arrangement of modern Russia.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they have been too cheap thus far.

I'm pretty sure that Bezos had enough money to bribe moderate chunks of the army.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Personnel is one thing.

Modern warfighting is outrageously expensive. Guided munitions can cost hundreds of thousands each. Armored vehicles cost millions. Combat aircraft, tens of millions. And it continues to cost tons of money just to keep them in a bunker ready to go.

They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

There is a reason they're all too happy to keep letting you and me indirectly fund their military aspirations through taxes.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Insane that the rich hate taxes so much, that they're willing to put literal narcissist criminal idiots in charge thinking "I can definitely control and predict this guy's behavior and surely that will be good for my business rather than just not having a 37th yacht and paying taxes and making the world an objectively better place not only for the other 7 billion inhabitants but probably more stable for my own interests as well."

If we weren't all being tossed into the furnace with them, it would be something I'd never stop laughing at.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's the crazy part, unless they're "outlawed" billionaires should try and improve people's lives since it means they would have more money to spend on the crap those billionaires are selling! It's hard to sell stuff on Amazon if everyone is struggling to afford housing and food.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago

UPS just laid off 20K workers on the expectation that Amazon deliveries will be way down.

Container ships are down 60%. More than any month during the pandemic.

Trump is imploding the entire economy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 132 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’ll get the people grumbling.

Walmart should also do this.

Grocery stores too.

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Thoughts on how to make this happen:

  • Whenever a shopowner is already critical of Trump, call them and suggest it directly.

  • Ask your local cashiers and other store clerks how come the prices rose, and whether that really is all tariffs. Again and again. And ideally so that other shoppers overhear it.

  • Make angry social media posts explicitly asking the same, explicitly tagging your local store and/or the chain to which they belong, and muse about looking into their competitors.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 116 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump: “We’re increasing foreign prices because we want consumers to prefer buying American.”

Retailers: “These foreign goods are more expensive than American-made ones.”

Trump: “How dare you tell them that!”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 106 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Telling people how much the Trump Tax costs them is now considered “hostility”. Got it.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You aren't supposed to make the President look bad. That is illegal.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 99 points 1 week ago (2 children)

would be a great add-on for firefox, though

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Incredibly hard to source that data from the outside. Even if you can identify the suppliers, different parts of an assembly may be classified differently, even between different importers who may have partial exemptions.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Anybody want to bet Bazos backs down?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Annnnnd he did. You called it.

Pathetic boot licker bezos

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 57 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Amazon .com denied a report on Tuesday that it planned to disclose the cost that U.S. tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump were adding to its products, after the White House blasted the initial story.

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/white-house-amazon-tariff-price-announcement-is-hostile-2025-04-29/

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bezos is a sniveling coward.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The dude looks like he keeps a half billion in cash on him at all times to try and buy his way out of the angry mob(s) that will eventually come for him... Because he's that much of a doucher.

What's really insane is that even with all his money, the best he can do for a wife is some kind of plastic surgery experiment that looks like it came out of the Tool Prison Sex music video.

Just so afraid of losing a small amount of the fortune he can't spend in his lifetime, that he's given up the true power that comes with that type of wealth. The power to help

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe this will show him that you can't buy Trumps loyalty because he has no loyalty. However, I have my doubts that even Trump going from going from "My good buddy Bezos" to "Amazon is the enemy" in the course of a day will be enough of a object lesson for Bozos.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You see Jeff, once you start groveling to the autocrat you are not allowed to stop.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

exists in reality, logically examines reality, does rational thing

HOW DARE YOU

[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago

Cool! Send Bezos to El Salvador.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 29 points 1 week ago

"How dare you offer clarity about what we've done!"

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 28 points 1 week ago

Yeah, no shit it's hostile. This Administration is being hostile to their business! What in the fuck did they expect to happen?

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wonder if Bezos will ask for his money back

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m sure there is a newer version available; probably an Amazon off-brand even.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

These snowflakes are offended by their shadow being black. Bunch of fucking idiots.

[–] some_dude@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It seems he's amping up his language. I think he recently said a former associate was guilty of treason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

How dare you try to hide that shit, drumpf you cancerous toad! If Amazon has any balls, which it doesn't and has proved so, it would not back down. I wanna know why my shit is more expensive and I wanna be able to point my fucking finger.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I want to punch that bitch in the face every time I see a pic of her.

[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Even if she has onlyfans?

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The truth is usually hostile to this administration.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

I mean, I thought Jeff was being charitable during the inauguration.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Try realistic

[–] Regna@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

As a European, I must thank the US for making my pet products cheaper. Way cheaper. Way cheaper than I could ever expect.

I just wish I could buy these products, these same products, without ruining the world and my morality as well.

But what am I talking about… my cats deserve litter robots at 90 % discount. (Edit: obviously sarcasm)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would call this move by Amazon honest.

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

I thought the same but apparently Amazon back-tracked like the wimps they are. It would have been the right thing to do but the fact they gave up on it makes a lot more sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was wondering when retailers would do this. American retailers do this with all other large taxes and fees. Why would this be any different?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›